Stephen McConnell wrote:
>
> The words "the sponsor should take responsibility" is something I agree
> with and is the first tangible link to a rationale between sponsor and
> Member that I have seen so far.
then i think we have been having a significant disconnect. i think the
link has been very clearly identified.
> For example, if a Member undertakes such a
> resonsibility, to whom is the member responsible and what would be the
> scope of such a responsibility?
to the podling and the incubator pmc, to see that everything gets
done and done properly. similarly to the foundation, with the additional
responsibility of only sponsoring a podling which, in the member's
judgement, will be an asset to the asf.
> p.s. Please keep in mind that I looking at this in terms of documeted
> incubation procedures
which are not fully crystallised yet.
> - not in terms of a specific projects, Members, or non-Members.
then i'll expect to hear no more from you about 'discrimination against
non-members.'
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
|