incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefano Mazzocchi <stef...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ASF member role - accountable to whom
Date Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:14:14 GMT

On Sunday, Sep 21, 2003, at 06:15 Europe/Rome, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:

>
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:25:53 -0400
> Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com> wrote:
>
>> Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
>>>
>>> "Meritocracy"?
>> yes, meritocracy.  the entire asf is a meritocracy, as is each
>> project within it.
>
> I see. but here's one question. Does this "meritocracy"
> encourage the inactive *ASF members* into the retirement status
> or hibernation status?

it would, if the ASF members had consensus on what "inactive" means, or 
how to encourage without offending.

 > Also, I assume that all the ASF members have signed the "new" CLA
> as a matter of course ... is this true?

??? what is the 'new' CLA?

>>> Here is a gooooood stats on this (general@incubator) mailing list.
>> 	:
>>> Hope this helps :-)
>> not really, at least not for me, since i don't know what point
>> you're trying to make..
>
> Eheh,
>
> I should have put that on the threads of
> "[VOTE] dims for incubator PMC"
> or
> "[VOTE] New Chair (Re: cvs commit : incubator STATUS)"
> ... :-)
>
> Also, I will make use of this stats in
> "Please make me a committer of Incubator Project: incubator-site"
> campaign :-)

I admit I'm lost as much as Ken on this. What the hell are you talking 
about? can't you be more explicit, please?

--
Stefano.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message