Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-general-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33460 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2003 09:35:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: no List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33448 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2003 09:35:18 -0000 From: "Danny Angus" To: , "General@Incubator. Apache. Org" Subject: RE: [geronimo] Me, James and javaMail Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 10:39:44 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3F3218DC.17407153@Monson-Haefel.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N We are still open for considering proposals to be included in Mailet v3. I suggest that if there are appropriate changes which could be made to the API to make it conform with anything relevant you subscribe to server-dev@james and put forward some proposals with reasoning. Please be aware that we're pretty happy with the API at the moment, it has been stable for a long time and serves it purpose well, so we're probably not too recepetive to radical overhaul, but are receptive to sensitive extensions where they may lever it into new territory (like this). d. > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Monson-Haefel [mailto:Richard@Monson-Haefel.com] > Sent: 07 August 2003 10:16 > To: Danny Angus > Cc: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [geronimo] Me, James and javaMail > > > I just took a quick look at James. Nice job. I think the Mailet API is an > excellent component model and would work well as an MDB. We would need to > write adapters to make the Mailets conformant with EJB 2.1, but I don't > think that will be very difficult. What we will need to do, however, is > wrapper the calls to the Mailet with transaction and security control that > is consistent with the EJB 2.1 specification. Again, I don't think this > will be a big problem. Anyway, it looks good to me. I'll be happy to help > integrate James with Geronimo. > > Danny Angus wrote: > > > > What I would like to see for a > > > future release of > > > Geronimo is an E-Mail Message Bean container. That is, a Message > > > Bean that can > > > process incoming e-mails. > > > > We already have the Mailet API see: http://james.apache.org I'd be more > > interested in adapting this, and implementing a mailet container for > > geronimo than creating anything new in this space. > > > > d. > > -- > Richard Monson-Haefel > Author of J2EE Web Services (Addison-Wesley 2003) > Author of Enterprise JavaBeans, 3rd Edition (O'Reilly 2001) > Co-Author of Java Message Service (O'Reilly 2000) > http://www.Monson-Haefel.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org