Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27891 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2003 15:23:41 -0000 Received: from fep01.tuttopmi.it (HELO fep01-svc.flexmail.it) (212.131.248.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2003 15:23:41 -0000 Received: from apache.org ([80.204.154.181]) by fep01-svc.flexmail.it (InterMail vM.5.01.05.09 201-253-122-126-109-20020611) with ESMTP id <20030303152331.BMS28957.fep01-svc.flexmail.it@apache.org> for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:23:31 +0100 Message-ID: <3E63736B.1090902@apache.org> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:23:23 +0100 From: Nicola Ken Barozzi Reply-To: nicolaken@apache.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: OpenSAML / Incubator-PMC References: <20030303150909.25228.qmail@web12802.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030303150909.25228.qmail@web12802.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 03/03/2003 16.09: > Andrew, > > I just want the PMC to VOTE to take a stand (It could go either way, which is absolutely fine with > me). At the least, I need to be able to tell the RSA folks that we dropped this idea because of > the patent problems. I'm quite confident it would be a negative vote... but IMHO it's the board itself that could make a point on this. If you gather it reasonable, make a question about this to board@apache.org. I'm there too, so I will ensure that the enquiry will be followed. Thank you for your patience. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------