Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: fitz@red-bean.com
From: "B. W. Fitzpatrick" <fitz@red-bean.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
 incubator-site/build/site/projects/altrmi/api/org/apache/altrmi/server/impl/socket
 AbstractCompleteSocketStreamServer.html
 AbstractPartialSocketStreamServer.html
 CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedBinder.html
 CompleteSocketCustomStreamPipedConnection.html
 CompleteSocketCustomStreamServer.html 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:48:16 EST."
             <3E761870.8030500@Golux.Com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:09:08 -0600
Sender: fitz@red-bean.com
Message-Id: <20030317190908.8C3C51083C@pantheon.red-bean.com>


Rodent of Unusual Size <Ken.Coar@Golux.Com> writes:
> B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > 
> > First, is there a good reason to have these generated javadoc/jars in CVS
> > if someone can build them?  
> 
> one good reason to have them in cvs is in case they
> need a special tool in order to be built.  if that's
> the case, by not keeping the generated docs in cvs
> you're forcing anyone who wants to have them local
> to also have the tool installed.

Well, I don't really think that's a good reason to put them in CVS,
but I don't feel the need to argue about it. :)
 
> if the tool is, like, part of every single java or
> jvm package, i think it might be reasonable to not
> have them in cvs.

Oh, definitely.

-Fitz

--
Brian W. Fitzpatrick    <fitz@red-bean.com>   http://www.red-bean.com/fitz/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org