incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <hls...@attbi.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
Date Tue, 11 Mar 2003 23:17:24 GMT
All audit issues have been taken care of, per the schedule I posted on the
Audit.

The GPL module and all code that imports it no longer exists (we could
remove the ,v file from the repository I suppose).
The LPGL modules used in demos are no longer in the repository, or shippped
as part of the demo.

Dion is helping out with Maven integraton.  I'm tapped out in terms of
bandwidth and haven't had time to learn Maven.  This is the first step to
Gump integration, right?

--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
http://jakarta.apache.org/proposals/tapestry



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver@apache.org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:06 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: pmc@incubator.apache.org; Tapestry development
> Subject: Re: [VOTE:PMC] Release Tapestry to Jakarta
> 
> 
> -1 until all audit issues are resolved: 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TapestryAudits/Feb2003 - 
> Its my duty as a member of the foundation and as a sponsoring 
> member of 
> tapestry to sit watch over this and I take it seriously.
> 
> and until Tapestry builds under Gump.  (not an official 
> requirement just 
> mine as a sponsoring member)
> 
> Once both of those are resolved I'll change that to a +1 not before.  
> While I agree that the incubator in its current form has been 
> a wasteful 
> excercise.  The incubation period itself proved useful in that it 
> exposed issues that I was not aware of (regarding GPL jars used in 
> example code).
> I'm torn, I consider the incubator itself to be a failure and the 
> process (or lack there of) to have dragged on, but the "incubation 
> period" has itself been useful if only for this purpose.  
> Take that as a 
> statement of support supposing you seriously refactor and rescope 
> (smaller) the incubator. 
> 
> -Andy
> 
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> 
> >
> > Conor MacNeill wrote, On 11/03/2003 8.26:
> >
> >> With respect to Tapestry, I agree. I think the incubator PMC should
> >> perhaps vote to promote it into Jakarta. The current limbo is not 
> >> fair to the people involved.
> >
> >
> > ACK.
> >
> > Tapestry has a vibrant community, that has already suffered too much
> > from our incubation "experiment", and that is well taken care of by 
> > Dion, Andy, and all the other Jakarta friends.
> >
> > I thereby bropose that we "release" Tapestry so that it becomes
> > officially part of Jakarta, and that the Jakarta PMC fully 
> takes it in 
> > charge.
> >
> > Incubator PMCers, please cast your votes.
> >
> > Mine: +1
> >
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 


Mime
View raw message