incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeremias Maerki <dev.jerem...@greenmail.ch>
Subject Re: cvs commit: incubator-altrmi status.xml
Date Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:02:47 GMT
The problem is rather that there are still people who think that the
short licence is ok. What I long for is a definitive statement (or a
reference to it) from an Apache member with his Apache hat on about this
topic. I have followed a lot of discussions but never found such a
statement. Maybe I just missed it. If anyone has one I'd be glad to send
a patch.

On 17.02.2003 15:47:15 Aaron Bannert wrote:
> Send a patch! :)
> -aaron
> 
> 
> On Monday, February 17, 2003, at 06:40  AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> 
> > I wonder when this is finally going to be hammered into stone somewhere
> > on the Apache website. Sorry, couldn't resist.
> >
> > On 17.02.2003 15:29:41 Aaron Bannert wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 07:58  AM, hammant@apache.org wrote:
> >>>   Index: BCELProxyGeneratorTestCase.java
> >>>   ===================================================================
> >>>   /*
> >>>    * Copyright (C) The Apache Software Foundation. All rights 
> >>> reserved.
> >>>    *
> >>>    * This software is published under the terms of the Apache 
> >>> Software
> >>> License
> >>>    * version 1.1, a copy of which has been included with this
> >>> distribution in
> >>>    * the LICENSE.txt file.
> >>>    */
> >>
> >> Last I heard, we don't allow inclusion of the license by reference,
> >> which means someone will have to go into each one of these files and
> >> put the full license...



Jeremias Maerki


Mime
View raw message