incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicola Ken Barozzi <>
Subject Re: Bylaws duplication
Date Thu, 30 Jan 2003 19:01:01 GMT

Sander Striker wrote:
>>From: Jim Jagielski []
>>Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:14 PM
>>At 10:27 PM +1100 1/30/03, Conor MacNeill wrote:
>>>Hi all,
>>>It seems that I too was under the impression that the incubator
>>>project would be providing the documentation on the "Apache Way".
>>>AIUI, Incubator would not only serve to help new projects develop
>>>the Apache way of doing things, it would serve as the definitive
>>>reference for all other projects. Sander has raised the possibility
>>>that this may not be the case.
> Hold on there.  I was pointing out that our current infrastructural
> related things that committers should be aware of are currently
> documented at  I wanted to keep stuff
> about cvs together with the other stuff about cvs.  If our Incubator
> site is done either the pages on that subject move here, or will
> be linked to.  We can decide on that when the time is right.

Exactly, I've come to agree on this too. The best thing is to start to 
gather all information here at least as links, and later eventually 
integrate the docs in a single one with the help of the original page 

> Bylaws however are an entirely different beast...  I don't feel
> any different from what Jim wrote in his response.

And the same rule applies here.

New PMCs have come up with interesting variations of some PMC rules, so 
we could do the same as with other resources and link to them from here.

Then make boilerplates, or even concurrently with the links, and narrow 
down to a personalized one later.

Nicola Ken Barozzi         
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)

View raw message