From bhyde@pobox.com  Tue Dec  3 01:54:58 2002
Return-Path: <bhyde@pobox.com>
Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 92406 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 01:54:58 -0000
Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (204.127.202.63)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 01:54:58 -0000
Received: from pobox.com (h00055da7108f.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.192.113])
          by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with SMTP
          id <2002120301550400300m844pe>; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 01:55:05 +0000
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:55:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [STATUS] (incubator) Wed Nov 27 23:46:01 EST 2002
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
From: Ben Hyde <bhyde@pobox.com>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3DEB8C6E.DDE57E76@Golux.Com>
Message-Id: <3EE6241E-0662-11D7-98C4-003065CC5042@pobox.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548)
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

It sounded a little paternal.  shug.

On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 11:38 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Ben Hyde wrote:
>>
>> "Educating new developers" licenses the incubator to inject it's self
>> into body of the routine make_new_committer()
>
> this is a problem?  meseems we have had ample demonstration lately
> that many of the various instantiations of make_new_committer() are
> either flawed or stubbed.

You don't want to support the candy-bowl platform?