incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen McConnell <mcconn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: veto stuff
Date Fri, 08 Nov 2002 01:08:47 GMT

Jim:

Is there anything that states an obligation to communicate a veto on a 
dev list?  
Is a veto valid if it is not published to the dev community?

Cheers, Steve.


Jim Jagielski wrote:

>At 12:41 AM -0500 11/7/02, Ted Husted wrote:
>  
>
>>I agree with Steve in that the assertions that a "veto cannot be
>>overruled" and a "veto must be justified" are contradictory. The
>>implication is that a unjustified veto is void, but who decides it
>>is void? And in deciding a veto is void, is it not being
>>overruled?
>>
>>    
>>
>
>The concept is that a veto must be rationlized. There must be
>a reason behind it and one that can be possibly put to a test
>(think scientific theory here). So a veto because "I don't like
>it" is not valid, and since it's not valid isn't being "overruled"
>because it just doesn't exist.
>  
>

-- 

Stephen J. McConnell

OSM SARL
digital products for a global economy
mailto:mcconnell@osm.net
http://www.osm.net




Mime
View raw message