Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EE634DEAC for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75003 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 13:58:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74948 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 13:58:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74926 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2012 13:58:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:58:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gary.griswold@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.169] (HELO mail-qc0-f169.google.com) (209.85.216.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:57:52 +0000 Received: by qcsd16 with SMTP id d16so640211qcs.0 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:57:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to :references:message-id:x-mailer; bh=PuqNRADr7a9c9RfQAfOA4btgibvJwwOcaS5hUTm0w74=; b=ddcO1QBk1l/a0VGhPXXWdhj3tZrlhVz0kaeT5ml4Y/OY1+/H1YzPBqzWo3rQPbf99t qnMj8vBvDSH3yHNqTXmsyJwnGPRPiVG16oAAk42RzQo9j+RTBKxCexo4ZaqjEvbzP4w5 HFTVTyXxLAFPTTxPM4x/vStu/eW0R/5tr6eFiZRdhsGSBPHwYFinUjag+Ar2CQ00tlWF fduvCsPTYT3It2f/Nz6/bnj+5GbpTtU6Hgb6IlPWtw5dVBdKlVfQtJzWYvPN2X4QXpYN 3jh6RBo0uSyUjrMx2nQw/cli29oI8WxZ7ckdmj6hpvsbUxCak0fYQSkx5T5HBdmf3UWj JmAQ== Received: by 10.229.136.145 with SMTP id r17mr2320441qct.43.1340805451685; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (EV1-DSL-74-215-7-197.fuse.net. [74.215.7.197]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy5sm22935664qab.3.2012.06.27.06.57.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 06:57:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Gary Griswold From: Gary Griswold Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7FF9BCDE-89A0-4997-9541-8D25CA2AEEB8" Subject: Re: What is the general perception of Apache Flex and Flash in mid 2012? Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:57:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49A6120706FCB3478131182D4CB585640A48F74E@D2DAG2B.d2.usa.net> To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org References: <49A6120706FCB3478131182D4CB585640A48F74E@D2DAG2B.d2.usa.net> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) --Apple-Mail=_7FF9BCDE-89A0-4997-9541-8D25CA2AEEB8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi, While I agree in general with the last three emails on the importance of = Flex, I am worried. In the last 6 months since Apache started work on = Flex, I have seen no discussion about features, and no plans of = development. So, while I really want Flex to survive and grow, I am = among those who are worried that my recent development work might all = need to be rewritten (or hopefully) converted to JS. If any of you know = where concrete information about plans and progress can be found, I = think it needs to made more available to the public. The following link was last updated in April when there was a = conference, and only mentioned some of the more important attendees, but = no substance. There was a link to the 360flex conference, which I = viewed over the web. https://blogs.apache.org/flex/ The conference was encouraging that Adobe was donating a little more = work soon to be finished, but the conference gave little to no = indication of what was going to happen to Flex within Apache. http://www.360flex.com/ The following link does announce 4.6, which as I understand it, is a = near equivalent to Adobe 4.5, and this is an important step, but where = does the project go from here? http://incubator.apache.org/flex/ If the Apache Flex wants people to believe in the future of Flex a much = better job has to be done delivering information about possible features = considered, features to be included, plans for development, and release = schedules. Gary On Jun 27, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Scott Matheson wrote: > Hi > I would say there are a number of issue, HTML / Java script is not = the way for complex development unless you develop with a commercial = tool, then you are back in to tie in problem, so no , HTML / Java = script is not the answer >=20 > The lack of visibility "marketing" of the community efforts does hurt = management view of the future >=20 > The real issue is the statements from OS providers and apparent lack = of flash player support in new products, Microsoft W8 tiles, new MS pad, = flash player in browsers etc. is just confusing, and unless you have = time to understand the details of each and every statement you just get = confused, I know that is the purpose of these companies >=20 > So all this confusion drives you to HTML / Java script >=20 > What we want to know is that they is a real effort from the community = to create flex compilers that will generate HTML / Java script or some = other run time that gives us back the build once run any place, IMHO = this is the key to keeping enterprises working with Flex, we have to = live with our work for 5-10 years, we need protection from Microsoft, = Apple, Google etc. >=20 > Scott >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: John DiRuggiero [mailto:jdiru@me.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 11:26 AM > To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: What is the general perception of Apache Flex and Flash = in mid 2012? >=20 > Successfully building mobile apps has been achieved through = development on the Flex framework. I see Flex as indicated by the name = as flexible and the power and elegance of ActionScript 3 makes one hope = that Apache Flex will continue to be successful and continue to = collectively grow. > - John D. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jun 27, 2012, at 3:53 AM, Raju Bitter wrote: >=20 >> It has been more than half a year since Adobe announced that they are >> going to donate Flex to the Apache Foundation. The community has been >> very active to work on a first 4.8 Apache Flex release. >>=20 >> What are your experiences with colleagues, friends and maybe = customers >> when you talk about the Apache Flex project? Do they see the whole >> effort as something very positive, or is the general attitude more >> like: "Let's see if Flex is going to survive as an Apache project". >>=20 >> I have the feeling that more people seem to realize that HTML5 apps >> are not as perfect/powerful as they thought they'd be, but at the = same >> time the general interest in Flash - outside the online game industry >> - seems to be relatively low. I can imagine that a first 4.8 release >> will convince people that Apache Flex is going to be successful ASF >> project. >>=20 >> I'd be really interested in what your experiences have been in the >> past months, as Flex experts, project managers, evangelists... >>=20 >> - Raju >=20 >=20 > ________________________________ >=20 > Disclaimer: This electronic mail and any attachments are confidential = and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please = notify the sender immediately by replying to this email, and destroy all = copies of this email and any attachments. Thank you. --Apple-Mail=_7FF9BCDE-89A0-4997-9541-8D25CA2AEEB8--