Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5A31DD48 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13609 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 20:43:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13581 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2012 20:43:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 13571 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2012 20:43:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:43:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:43:08 +0000 Received: by vcbfl15 with SMTP id fl15so1048115vcb.6 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=D/jgiKHASZHHD1RFYuquNPBlNg63vak9LFCvVsGTPrA=; b=Gen17aMPxr/hRAHNjqL+Jf0hwTMywNIuh4pllVydXkUWPxGfN7T/QPOrpToeGt/xtc JsHesYPM86cEtITumPql2/P1TnQDxVnF7u+7OnxnjZpWQAhsTCnGce2j7xSBgpT168gP aNknzpn2/r1qvBGnZu0wk6OdzigJMwphOW9xN7ijUrTCywHGaaVHjaBep72mmmOj5Omw 3VJiip5CzDIxDP2nap9BEyNZUjqXVf0LTcmQcWIkZXrhPMgj8UhEcrxEygnjEA9P1/fp LRoJU7UnISdGzGPEdEiSz+P59nFYDTd0rhs5Kfp9kV9nDllmc95vxP8vnH2UjqxFO1fP yNlA== Received: by 10.52.64.146 with SMTP id o18mr12933877vds.55.1340829767305; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.13.252.127] ([199.19.136.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c17sm60625010vdj.11.2012.06.27.13.42.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FEB7040.1070000@dot-com-it.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:42:40 -0400 From: Jeffry Houser Reply-To: jeffry@dot-com-it.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: What is the general perception of Apache Flex and Flash in mid 2012? References: ,,<49A6120706FCB3478131182D4CB585640A48F74E@D2DAG2B.d2.usa.net>,<3023BF1434B2CD49BC9E0272DA77233138B1682A82@EMARC122VS01.exchad.jpmchase.net>,<4FEB1F7E.20606@dot-com-it.com>,<56ADE931-F846-4417-BCF6-05533286D6FB@gmail.com>,<59557B4F-92DA-41A1-ABC3-E4D5D6122C72@shortsands.com>,<3023BF1434B2CD49BC9E0272DA77233138B1682C5F@EMARC122VS01.exchad.jpmchase.net>,,,<4FEB36DE.2080701@dot-com-it.com>,,<4FEB429B.7060406@dot-com-it.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnVySBR3FBsmJFUis1csV3FZNUELEoA1lXOBW8sSRcX/usJr8m7Uhl/v9YZWdheKl2uO5UC X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That is my fault; I thought this was on the flex-dev list. I am wrong on the purpose of the user list and need to pay more attention to which list I am responding to. On 6/27/2012 3:53 PM, Michael Wissner wrote: > That is perfectly acceptable, if you have no interest in contributing > to the Flex SDK; there is no need to be on the list. > So I am not sure this list is what you think it is. > > If I am wrong, please let me know the list that is for users to discuss their needs and expectations. In that case I'd also suggest you rename this list to something else. > > Michael > > > >> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:27:55 -0400 >> From: jeffry@dot-com-it.com >> To: flex-users@incubator.apache.org >> CC: gary@shortsands.com >> Subject: Re: What is the general perception of Apache Flex and Flash in mid 2012? >> >> On 6/27/2012 12:43 PM, Gary Griswold wrote: >>> OK, I will unsubscribe. My plan is to continue development in Flex with my current project over the next 12 months, and then see the status of things and decide what to do. >> That is perfectly acceptable, if you have no interest in contributing >> to the Flex SDK; there is no need to be on the list. >> >> Despite the coldness of my original post, there are ways to contribute >> without devoting tons of time writing code: >> >> 1) If you find an error, be sure to file a bug report ( >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX ) >> 2) If you fix an error that is relevant to your own development, you can >> file a bug report and include your fix as a patch. >> 3) If can also submit feature requests in the JIRA bug base. >> 4) Write and provide documentation >> 5) Write and provide code samples >> >> However, I, personally, do not want to be treated as "The private >> development team" of every Flex developer. >> >>> It is much more feasible for me to buy Sencha's Flex to JS translator than it is to spend time doing source code development. >> I was unaware that Sencha had a Flex to JS Translator. >> >> >> -- >> Jeffry Houser >> Technical Entrepreneur >> 203-379-0773 >> -- >> http://www.flextras.com?c=104 >> UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! >> -- >> http://www.theflexshow.com >> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >> http://www.asktheflexpert.com >> -- >> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust >> >