Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.191 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:33:33 -0800
Subject: Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player
 versions
Thread-Topic: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player
 versions
Thread-Index: Ac3dbtc3ogKSTFCvRA+g40tkqX7aoAAAN7mJ
Message-ID: <CCF62F3D.4A314%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <24DE5AA8-C741-4AD3-8486-2A83B83C5099@classsoftware.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


On 12/18/12 2:26 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
>> I would say that it is up to him (Justin, your thoughts?)  I am all for
>> releasing sooner than later, but we need to follow the steps in the righ=
t
>> order.
>=20
> Given that  most users of the SDK are going to use the default of FP 11.1=
/AIR
> 3.4 we needs test that on windows/OSX, everything else is nice to have.
FP 11.1 and AIR 3.4 is a swf-version mismatch, isn't it?  Anyway, we should
run SWCs built with that version against the latest player so we can try to
catch an serious behavior issues upfront.  I'll do that this week sometime
(of course, it assumes the Projector player has the same behavior as the
browser plugins).
>=20
> I don't think we need to drop support for older versions of the flash pla=
yer,
> just state that they have not been fully tested and that there may be som=
e
> unknown issues.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Justin

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui