Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82C5DD6A2 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:31:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42347 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2012 22:31:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42310 invoked by uid 500); 18 Dec 2012 22:31:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 42301 invoked by uid 99); 18 Dec 2012 22:31:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:31:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.181] (HELO exprod6og101.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:31:06 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob101.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUNDulS3qkE6SY+Vgn33jCP/Qq5K7g2qK@postini.com; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:46 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBIMUhuN027725 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBIMUgAV028471 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:42 -0800 Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%11]) with mapi; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:42 -0800 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:30:38 -0800 Subject: Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions Thread-Topic: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions Thread-Index: Ac3dbeuoIt/70DMQQ02KOgU/zMaarAAAWImo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/18/12 2:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > Hi, >=20 >> The RC does not contain the full mustella suite (not very useful to most >> folks) so you need to be able to redirect a branch's mustella run agains= t an >> external set of SWCs and compiler. >=20 > Perhaps the way to look at this is what would a user of the SDK expect? >=20 > Currently we are not packaging up the mustella tests with the release > packages, this means that there's likely only a small window of time wher= e all > the mustella tests will work with the released package (due to ongoing ch= anges > to the tests). Really, the existing tests should not be changing. New tests should be added, but we might find a clever way to manage them so don't run tests tha= t don't have features in a particular release. >=20 > How important is it for user of the SDK to be able to run the mustalla te= sts? > If it not important then all that matters is that we can test a RC with s= ome > confidence and it doesn't matter what location those test are in. If it i= s > important we should package the tests are part of the release (preferable= in a > separate zip IMO). >=20 I think it is the former. Most folks who are not approving an RC probably don't need to run mustella. --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui