Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93B78E3B2 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84210 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 15:27:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84170 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2012 15:27:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84160 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2012 15:27:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:27:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pent@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.234] (HELO exprod6og119.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:27:12 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob119.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUM85uvdEtuIz5Dwcw2ZjLb05c298GqiP@postini.com; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:26:51 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (ms-exchange.macromedia.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBHFQmuN005161 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:26:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBHFQhAl012206 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:26:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambxv01a.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.95]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:26:32 -0800 From: Peter Ent To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 07:26:30 -0800 Subject: Re: Question about Flex future and performance Thread-Topic: Question about Flex future and performance Thread-Index: Ac3cauQvd73fJ+DjQ2WSKog72BqqDA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <71063F7D4C254EC0BDA8D43D778CA63C@SteviePC> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Regarding remoting, all of that is handled by the Flash Player; Flex just had a wrapper around it. I'm not aware of any Flex-specific remote interface APIs. This means you can do data driven, remote, apps in Starling. I can't speak for the GPU rendering/performance issues except to say Flex does have some access to Stage3D items via StageText and StageVideo, but they are a little awkward to use from Flex. Peter Ent Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems On 12/17/12 10:17 AM, "Lists" wrote: >Hi everyone, > > >I' m writing data driven Server connected mobile apps with Flash Builder >for >PHP in Flex, AS3 and PHP. >A field which is currently more or less underrated and canceled by Adobe >(see announcements and update behavior for Flash Builder). >http://forums.adobe.com/thread/930792 > >Thre are a couple of performance boost- options out there (gpu rendering). >But only for AS3, Starling, game development. >I found no tutorials how to develop data driven apps (incl. remoting) with >Starling/Feathers/AS3 instead of Flex. >This is very disapointing since this could be a real milestone for serious >mobile apps (not only for gaming). > >Are there any options for Flex-development reaching better performance/ >better frame rates? > >I mean see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D-_m3XhOkjgo > >Why the hell is Adobe talking about 60 fps for game development only, >while >other/better solutions were there? >OpenPlug is dead, but are there any survived techniques for >Flex-app-renderings? > >c u stevie >