Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B350D02A for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76815 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 05:49:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76599 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2012 05:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 76551 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2012 05:49:09 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:49:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.208 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.208] (HELO exprod6og107.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.208) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 05:49:01 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com ([192.150.11.134]) by exprod6ob107.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUMlsOUYKVtCIv45xfNMBf+qefUCzT/kM@postini.com; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:48:41 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4.adobe.com [193.104.215.14]) by outbound-smtp-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id qBD5jk1v014102 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:45:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas01.corp.adobe.com (nacas01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.99]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id qBD5mcXL001074 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:48:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nacas01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:48:37 -0800 Received: from NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.127.96]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%11]) with mapi; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:48:37 -0800 From: Alex Harui To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 21:48:34 -0800 Subject: Re: Release target and Jenekins Thread-Topic: Release target and Jenekins Thread-Index: Ac3Y6aZSlD9lba3iSxKGYgu2CHJmjAAC9a0R Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I always run: ant main checkintests Or ant clean main checkintests Can we have it do something like that? It might need to run super-clean instead of clean. On 12/12/12 8:22 PM, "Om" wrote: > Okay, here is the problem. >=20 > sdk/build.xml -checkintests calls sdk/mustella/makemustella.swc before it > can run the tests. In order to make the mustella.swc, the flex sdk shoul= d > be built first. Right now, it is not and hence mustella.swc cannot be > built. >=20 > I am testing a fix on my local jenkins that builds the sdk before calling > checkintests. >=20 > The other option is to modify the Flex_SDK_Build job to run checkintests > after building. >=20 > Which would be preferable? >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Om wrote: >=20 >> Good news. I ran the same job locally on my instance of Jenkins and I a= m >> getting the same exact error . Will debug it on my machine by this >> evening. >>=20 >> Thanks, >> Om >>=20 >>=20 >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >>=20 >>> BTW, the flashplayer trust folder might be in >>> %systemroot%\syswow64\macromed >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On 12/12/12 1:31 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On 12/12/12 1:23 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Hi, >>>>>=20 >>>>>> {sdk_folder}/build.xml - checkintests task >>>>> I'd give that a go first, but either is probably fine. Any automated >>> testing >>>>> we have is far better than none. >>>> Yes, the one from the top level build.xml. It might call into >>> sub-folder >>>> targets, but the true test is getting it to work from the top-level. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Justin >>>=20 >>> -- >>> Alex Harui >>> Flex SDK Team >>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 --=20 Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui