Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of aharui@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.29 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:36:55 -0800
Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
Thread-Topic: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
Thread-Index: Ac3YrT18g+S4CD+iTDmX8sIrLL6yNAAA5DHc
Message-ID: <CCEE38F7.49ED3%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU162-ds202AE297A9C86703519E05B44F0@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/13.13.0.120411
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Much better!


On 12/12/12 1:10 PM, "Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Done ! :$
>=20
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:01 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
>=20
> Fred,
>=20
> I tried to run mustella and got an error about a missing class ErrorArray=
.
> Did you check it in?
>=20
>=20
> On 12/12/12 12:51 PM, "Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wro=
te:
>=20
>> Well, I guess I mixed the 2 threads, the one about the rc and the one
>> about
>> the checkin-test, my bad but thank's because you answered my question
>> anyway.
>>=20
>> - Fred.
>>=20
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> From: Alex Harui
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:44 PM
>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 12/12/12 12:30 PM, "Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wr=
ote:
>>=20
>>>> Then will run mustella on it.  Has anyone done a full mustella run on
>>>> the
>>>> rc
>>>=20
>>> I didn't do it on the rc but the develop branch today and was wondering
>>> if
>>> the last fixes could be integrated in the rc.
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "last fixes".  I forgot to start a mustell=
a
>> run on the changes I have pending last night.  I have moved the changes
>> over
>> to my Windows computer and am setting up to run mustella against RC2 (no=
w
>> that I've fixed the build script).  If that passes then I will check tho=
se
>> changes into RC2.  I can't imagine mustella would pass against RC2 for
>> anybody until I get my changes verified and checked in.
>>=20
>> Any changes you've made in the develop branch that are needed to get
>> mustella to pass should get integrated over to release4.9 branch
>> (although,
>> in theory, better to apply the changes into the release4.9 branch and
>> bring
>> them back to develop branch).  However, my current workflow is to run th=
e
>> develop branch's mustella against the RC itself, so I don't have to
>> integrate develop branch mustella changes into release4.9.

--=20
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui