Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-16308-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A927BD2C3
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:09:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 45398 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 21:09:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45335 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2012 21:09:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 45327 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2012 21:09:34 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:09:34 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
	tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of cframpto@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.238 as permitted sender)
Received: from [64.18.1.238] (HELO exprod6og122.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.238)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:09:27 +0000
Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by
 exprod6ob122.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKUMZPcunApwiDShkSPify5UYuhRPi2zw+@postini.com;
 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:09:07 PST
Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237])
	by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
 qBAL95uN012961
	for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97])
	by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id qBAL3qYE014018
	for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:09:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nambx09.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.47]) by
 nahub01.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.97]) with mapi; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:07:51
 -0800
From: Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:07:47 -0800
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in
 /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml
 spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml
Thread-Topic: svn commit: r1418709 - in
 /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml
 spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml
Thread-Index: Ac3XGmo51J/DGpKWQyy3u4+8fGdspQ==
Message-ID: <CCEBB80C.20458%cframpto@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOAmsm4r+6RR=uL9VFcrgCi35eo5iW934eUg_URtYuigvxVwzg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

As far as I know the sdk build isn't using the build.number files (the
installer has one which is being used).  build.number is a "magic" file
which the ant build number task uses.

There is a build.number property in the top-level build.properties file
which is overridden with the svn rev for release builds with
-Dbuild.number=3D<svn last changed rev> on the command line of the build.

Carol

On 12/10/12 3 :44PM, "Chema Balsas" <jbalsas@gmail.com> wrote:

>I did a full mustella run over the weekend (it takes my computer over 12
>hours...). In an initial pass, I got about 70 errors or so with the swcs
>not including version.properties. Then I reverted the changes and run the
>mustella on the failures getting the same errors, the changes don't seem
>to
>introduce any new errors.
>
>@Justin Since you were the one to raise concerns about this, does this
>look
>good to you?
>
>To wrap it up, in the other thread Gordon said:
>
>I think Adobe's build machines had some scripts that set build.number to
>> the Perforce revision number that it was building.
>
>
>I assumed this was being used to keep track of the released versions of
>some swcs. Can someone on Adobe confirm or further comment on this? What
>strikes me as odd is that only those 3 swcs were including this file. Is
>there some explanation for this, or is this maybe just some code left from
>the donation process?
>
>Cheers,
>Chema
>
>2012/12/8 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
>
>> There was a discussion in another thread. Maybe I misunderstood. Anyway
>> develop branch was broken.  Release branch doesn't have this problem.
>>
>> Sent from my Motorola ATRIX=81 4G on AT&T
>>
>>
>> -----Original message-----
>> From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
>> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>> Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 17:33:55 GMT+00:00
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in
>> /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml
>> spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > Remove version.properties include-file directive from rpc, spark and
>> spark_dmv as conflicts with compile-config.xml and is currently unused
>> You might want to double check that it not used in the release build. I
>> think that the version number is used when generating the RSLs.
>>
>> Justin
>>