Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com
 designates 65.55.111.83 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <BLU162-ds202AE297A9C86703519E05B44F0@phx.gbl>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <CCEE30A2.49EBE%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <CCEE30A2.49EBE%aharui@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:10:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Importance: Normal

Done ! :$

-----Message d'origine----- 
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 10:01 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9

Fred,

I tried to run mustella and got an error about a missing class ErrorArray.
Did you check it in?


On 12/12/12 12:51 PM, "Fr�d�ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I guess I mixed the 2 threads, the one about the rc and the one 
> about
> the checkin-test, my bad but thank's because you answered my question
> anyway.
>
> - Fred.
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> From: Alex Harui
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:44 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Test Release of Apache Flex 4.9
>
>
>
>
> On 12/12/12 12:30 PM, "Fr�d�ric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Then will run mustella on it.  Has anyone done a full mustella run on 
>>> the
>>> rc
>>
>> I didn't do it on the rc but the develop branch today and was wondering 
>> if
>> the last fixes could be integrated in the rc.
> I'm not sure what you mean by "last fixes".  I forgot to start a mustella
> run on the changes I have pending last night.  I have moved the changes 
> over
> to my Windows computer and am setting up to run mustella against RC2 (now
> that I've fixed the build script).  If that passes then I will check those
> changes into RC2.  I can't imagine mustella would pass against RC2 for
> anybody until I get my changes verified and checked in.
>
> Any changes you've made in the develop branch that are needed to get
> mustella to pass should get integrated over to release4.9 branch 
> (although,
> in theory, better to apply the changes into the release4.9 branch and 
> bring
> them back to develop branch).  However, my current workflow is to run the
> develop branch's mustella against the RC itself, so I don't have to
> integrate develop branch mustella changes into release4.9.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui