Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Subject: Re: Flash Builder issues and 4.9 release candidate
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACK5iZd9=HLUhK1sV0CNwT-2yxZ3xjHKoM08wp6bxytW_oE-Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:00:42 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5FB8B827-24A2-4732-AB02-CDA3225D497C@classsoftware.com>
References: <FFACF7BF-488D-442C-B7BE-D87496062166@classsoftware.com>
 <CACK5iZd9=HLUhK1sV0CNwT-2yxZ3xjHKoM08wp6bxytW_oE-Sw@mail.gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org

Hi,

> I think that we should at least support FB 4.6 and 4.7 with a Flex SDK =
release.
We should be able to support Java 1.6, but it's looking rather tricky to =
get FB to work with Java 1.7. For Java 1.7 it also looks like we'd need =
to provide instructions on modify the FB config (assuming it's even =
possible) as there is unlikely anything we can do to the SDK itself to =
make it work out of the box with FB - or as far as I can tell at the =
moment.

> This version of the SDK would be pretty much useless if we don't =
support FB.
I think it's more of a case of Adobe supporting Java 1.7 and Apache =
Flex, there a few things we can do config files in teh right place and =
format but beyond that it get a lot harder.

Thanks,
Justin=