From flex-dev-return-16039-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Dec 6 18:49:39 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED6B0E30C for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 18:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17698 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2012 18:49:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17671 invoked by uid 500); 6 Dec 2012 18:49:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 17662 invoked by uid 99); 6 Dec 2012 18:49:37 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:49:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of webdoublefx@hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.108 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.111.108] (HELO blu0-omc2-s33.blu0.hotmail.com) (65.55.111.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:49:28 +0000 Received: from BLU162-DS6 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s33.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:49:07 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [82.247.153.175] X-EIP: [6MRIKfoJBUngxg7GPqN6Uw+ODoGCQyAN] X-Originating-Email: [webdoublefx@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_THOMAS?= To: References: <25CE630F-117B-4271-A564-A13FC24E58DA@classsoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <25CE630F-117B-4271-A564-A13FC24E58DA@classsoftware.com> Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9 Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:49:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Dec 2012 18:49:07.0750 (UTC) FILETIME=[5F3CC460:01CDD3E2] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests have not been run for each version >but each version has been compiled against. I ran almost successfully the test suite against the 10.3, the only tests failed was because of the localization, that should be all resolved now, let me udpate and run the tests suite again and eventually ask for reviewing the relative issues, I can do that before the end f the week end. (aside with eventually applying an other issue relative to charts optimisation too if you / I not considering it too much risky at the moment because there're no tests for them). - Fred -----Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:16 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9 Hi, >> 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash >> Player from 10.2 to 11.5 > > "can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions > been tested? As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests have not been run for each version but each version has been compiled against. >> 17 - Can use Java 7 to compile SDK (see README for instructions) > > This is true but FlashBuilder appears not to be able to compile mxml files > when the SDK is built with Java 7. Is this in JIRA? I added this because this issue had been marked as fixed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33110 >> 18 - Many improvements and updates to Mustella tests > > I didn't think we were releasing mustella in our source package. It's in the SDK source tree as I assume the build scripts will need to change to not included it. I think it still useful to know that it exists and that a lot of work has been done on it. > What about the maven stuff? It's not under the sdk source tree and as it's currently incomplete I not sure it should be in the release notes. Thanks, Justin