incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: We need your help testing Flex 4.9 with various Flash Player versions
Date Tue, 18 Dec 2012 22:30:38 GMT



On 12/18/12 2:20 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> The RC does not contain the full mustella suite (not very useful to most
>> folks) so you need to be able to redirect a branch's mustella run against an
>> external set of SWCs and compiler.
> 
> Perhaps the way to look at this is what would a user of the SDK expect?
> 
> Currently we are not packaging up the mustella tests with the release
> packages, this means that there's likely only a small window of time where all
> the mustella tests will work with the released package (due to ongoing changes
> to the tests).
Really, the existing tests should not be changing.  New tests should be
added, but we might find a clever way to manage them so don't run tests that
don't have features in a particular release.
> 
> How important is it for user of the SDK to be able to run the mustalla tests?
> If it not important then all that matters is that we can test a RC with some
> confidence and it doesn't matter what location those test are in. If it is
> important we should package the tests are part of the release (preferable in a
> separate zip IMO).
> 
I think it is the former.  Most folks who are not approving an RC probably
don't need to run mustella.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message