incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml
Date Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:18:28 GMT
I think Justin was worried about the RSL names when creating an RC.  How do
the RSLs get their names? Doesn't the TLF RSL have a different version
appended to its name?  Don't the other RSLs go from having a .0.0.0 to some
actual version?


On 12/10/12 1:07 PM, "Carol Frampton" <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:

> As far as I know the sdk build isn't using the build.number files (the
> installer has one which is being used).  build.number is a "magic" file
> which the ant build number task uses.
> 
> There is a build.number property in the top-level build.properties file
> which is overridden with the svn rev for release builds with
> -Dbuild.number=<svn last changed rev> on the command line of the build.
> 
> Carol
> 
> On 12/10/12 3 :44PM, "Chema Balsas" <jbalsas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I did a full mustella run over the weekend (it takes my computer over 12
>> hours...). In an initial pass, I got about 70 errors or so with the swcs
>> not including version.properties. Then I reverted the changes and run the
>> mustella on the failures getting the same errors, the changes don't seem
>> to
>> introduce any new errors.
>> 
>> @Justin Since you were the one to raise concerns about this, does this
>> look
>> good to you?
>> 
>> To wrap it up, in the other thread Gordon said:
>> 
>> I think Adobe's build machines had some scripts that set build.number to
>>> the Perforce revision number that it was building.
>> 
>> 
>> I assumed this was being used to keep track of the released versions of
>> some swcs. Can someone on Adobe confirm or further comment on this? What
>> strikes me as odd is that only those 3 swcs were including this file. Is
>> there some explanation for this, or is this maybe just some code left from
>> the donation process?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chema
>> 
>> 2012/12/8 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
>> 
>>> There was a discussion in another thread. Maybe I misunderstood. Anyway
>>> develop branch was broken.  Release branch doesn't have this problem.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Motorola ATRIX 4G on AT&T
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original message-----
>>> From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
>>> To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 17:33:55 GMT+00:00
>>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1418709 - in
>>> /incubator/flex/sdk/branches/develop/frameworks/projects: rpc/build.xml
>>> spark/build.xml spark_dmv/build.xml
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> Remove version.properties include-file directive from rpc, spark and
>>> spark_dmv as conflicts with compile-config.xml and is currently unused
>>> You might want to double check that it not used in the release build. I
>>> think that the version number is used when generating the RSLs.
>>> 
>>> Justin
>>> 
> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message