incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chema Balsas <jbal...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Falcon SDKSWCTests
Date Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:21:35 GMT
Hi Cyril,

The version.properties file is created and removed inside the compile
target for those projects.

It is generated at the beginning of the target by:
<echo file="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/version.properties"
append="false">build=${build.number}</echo>

And then removed at the end by:
<delete file="${FLEX_HOME}/frameworks/version.properties"/>

which is why you shouldn't find it ;)

2012/12/5 Cyrill Zadra <cyrill.zadra@gmail.com>

> Hey Chema
>
> In the follwing compile-config.xml is the version.properties included.
>
> rpc
> spark
> spark_dmv
>
>     <include-file>
>         <name>version.properties</name>
>         <path>../../version.properties</path>
>     </include-file>
>
> In my builded flex sdk it does not exists. Is that part really used or
> can it be removed? Or does anyone know how this version.properties is
> generated?
>
> Cyrill
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Chema Balsas <jbalsas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > @Cyril Thanks for noticing!
> >
> > @Gordon You're welcome! I'm really happy to see all this movement around
> > Falcon/FalconJS lately :)
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/1 Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com>
> >
> >> Oops! Thank you @Chema!
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >>
> >> On Nov 30, 2012, at 7:09 PM, "Cyrill Zadra" <cyrill.zadra@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Gordon
> >> >
> >> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml
> >> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile
> each
> >> SDK SWC.
> >> >
> >> > That wasn't me .. I think that work was done by Chema Balsas (see
> [1]).
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33226
> >> >
> >> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml
> >> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that compile
> each
> >> SDK SWC.
> >> >>
> >> >> Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc -
> passing,
> >> would anybody like to work on investigating the status of other tests
> that
> >> compile rpc.swc, mx.swc, spark.swc, etc.? We need to figure out whether
> the
> >> SDK source code needs to change because Falcon is pickier than the old
> >> compiler, or whether Falcon has AS bugs that need to be fixed.
> >> >>
> >> >> - Gordon
> >> >>
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message