incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roland Zwaga <>
Subject Re: Writable AST and Code generation for Falcon was: [Re: [jira] [Commented] (FLEX-33330) ... )
Date Sat, 29 Dec 2012 13:19:53 GMT
> I was thinking, maybe I'm not thinking in enough 5th dimensional thought
> here.
> I'm not married to linked tokens, because other than Gordon helping out I
> highly doubt I would even have time to implement that with the current
> parser.
> The code when parsed has insane AST source offsets to everything in the
> actual source file. If we were "injecting" AST into a class/method/etc., we
> would just basically be substringing it with a replace. The code generation
> could be done already with the AS emitter I have already made with FalconJx!
> Holy #$%@! I think that might actually work! :)

Hm, sounds pretty sweet. If its not too much work to create a small
experiment to proof your theory than this could be a worthy approach :)
Generating extra classes etc shouldn't be a problem I suppose?
What the AOP bits would do, in a nutshell, would basically be renaming an
existing class, creating a new class with the old name of this class (and
making it a subclass of the original) and then creating overridden methods
in the new class.
Come to think of, with this approach we wouldn't even need to inject
subtrees into existing AST's... All I need to do is rename certain classes,
I'm guessing that that wouldn't be too much of a hassle, right?


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message