incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>
Subject Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Date Thu, 06 Dec 2012 18:54:45 GMT
Fred,

I know you answered this a couple weeks ago but it's buried. What did  
you do to get the mustella to run and not crash your computer while  
you are working? Could you give a simple step procedure?

Mike

Quoting Frédéric THOMAS <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>:

>> As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests have not been run for each  
>> version but each version has been compiled against.
>
> I ran almost successfully the test suite against the 10.3, the only  
> tests failed was because of the localization, that should be all  
> resolved now, let me udpate and run the tests suite again and  
> eventually ask for reviewing the relative issues, I can do that  
> before the end f the week end. (aside with eventually applying an  
> other issue relative to charts optimisation too if you / I not  
> considering it too much risky at the moment because there're no  
> tests for them).
>
> - Fred
>
> -----Message d'origine----- From: Justin Mclean
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:16 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
>
> Hi,
>
>>> 13  - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
>>> Player from 10.2 to 11.5
>>
>> "can can" should be fixed.  And is this really true?  Have all versions
>> been tested?
>
> As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests have not been run for each  
> version but each version has been compiled against.
>
>
>>> 17  - Can use Java 7 to compile SDK (see README for instructions)
>>
>> This is true but FlashBuilder appears not to be able to compile mxml files
>> when the SDK is built with Java 7.
> Is this in JIRA? I added this because this issue had been marked as fixed:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33110
>
>>> 18  - Many improvements and updates to Mustella tests
>>
>> I didn't think we were releasing mustella in our source package.
> It's in the SDK source tree as I assume the build scripts will need  
> to change to not included it. I think it still useful to know that  
> it  exists and that a lot of work has been done on it.
>
>> What about the maven stuff?
> It's not under the sdk source tree and as it's currently incomplete  
> I not sure it should be in the release notes.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

-- 
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com


Mime
View raw message