Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2875D29D for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75612 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2012 02:00:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75580 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2012 02:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75572 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2012 02:00:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:00:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.169] (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:00:54 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hq4so1358672wib.0 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=H6kN5bVOBgUAPQDv8M0f8+q2VQ/L+5DugAUIhPuexBA=; b=CBEeBDLEzxM0lYlI39VIgSTH3of3KdHlGYtLqLoqvj0MeoCV7AoDJi2jYRNf3W3XDI QdWeY11lhfSHe7U5JPSwphRR3MedWDjY0hGSokFWSC8GyorM15x6h0eQarURK+nwVuBO obZCMFgG1NNApkCCME6I32J1iZThqaPz1dcbr0t2Ubgj7c9gUSf7ZlJUHrf8T0rszOAJ 72DFMlzq7tBaWGbPUMpkTC4diM6Xp6etsh415MZhYhNOPO4DTSngAo2P9q700x9WNLmz BfS9q3PD/yj7BYVjE9zVhYGxhKYVANwJ7YsX6izYWDSjDxfvZ3i88l2c1zWc/30eaKed j65g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.84.41 with SMTP id v9mr9189989wiy.8.1352599233062; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:33 -0800 (PST) Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.91.176 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.91.176 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:00:33 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 79Q1mFP2zXw3S0r-7a1uVQgvJNM Message-ID: Subject: Re: Community patches are waiting From: Om To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044289eccf683304ce2e8ce8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d044289eccf683304ce2e8ce8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Nick, Is that a systemic problem or is out a one off issue you are facing? Alex, How is your Mustella test selector app looking? Reducing the number of tests to run for each patch sounds like a good idea to increase the speed of community patch acceptance. Any other ideas? Thanks, Om ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" Date: Nov 10, 2012 3:14 PM My biggest issue is trying to build them against Mustella. I broke my mustella install locally, and haven't really fixed it in the last few weeks. I'm re-building it right now ;) -Nick On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Om wrote: > Folks, > > There are quite a few community patches waiting to be reviewed and > committed. > > I know we all are busy, but I am sure we can all find some time from our > schedule to perform these duties we all signed up for. > > The longer we delay these important tasks, the more despirited the > community will become about Apache Flex. > > What are the things that are preventing us from patching these very simple > changes? What can we do to be more efficient as a team going forward? > > Thanks, > Om > --f46d044289eccf683304ce2e8ce8--