Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56BB5D518 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45617 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2012 11:09:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45416 invoked by uid 500); 25 Nov 2012 11:09:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45388 invoked by uid 99); 25 Nov 2012 11:09:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:09:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.67.31.24] (HELO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de) (80.67.31.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:09:42 +0000 Received: from [10.128.0.7] (helo=exchange.df.eu) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Tca5Q-0008N6-KU for flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:09:20 +0100 Received: from ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local ([10.128.2.55]) by efe04.exchange.local ([10.128.0.7]) with mapi; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:09:20 +0100 From: "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:09:21 +0100 Subject: AW: AW: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list? Thread-Topic: AW: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list? Thread-Index: Ac3KZlHdllYzKOb/RY23tdrn4i1JEAAls7wQ Message-ID: <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072E158522B@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> References: <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072E1584FBB@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072E15851A1@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I think this was what Velo was refering to as "FlexMojos Enterprize", his c= ommercial Branch of FM. But I agree, when starting from scratch, we should do it the right way so a= ll the mobile stuff can be done too. Chris -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Fr=E9d=E9ric THOMAS [mailto:webdoublefx@hotmail.com]=20 Gesendet: Samstag, 24. November 2012 18:08 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list? Hi, @Chris, After a quick look at FM6, I realized that it use AIRPackager inste= ad of a direct call to ADT Class (4.6.0.x), so no target option (the type o= f package to create) can be append and then no mobile native application ca= n be generated except for AIR packaging. I guess, with a bit of effort, it would be possible to replace the Flexmojo= sAIRPackager to use ADT instead of AIRPackager and then be able to generat= e every kind of packaging, what do you thing about ? - Fred. -----Message d'origine----- From: christofer.dutz@c-ware.de Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 1:45 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: AW: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list? Well my Mavenizer doesn't deploy any air stuff besides the airglobal.swc an= d in the Flexmojos Testsuite there are tests for the different Air features= and I am not having any trouble with that. The only thing is that I do have to provide the same third party libs the F= lex SDK needs to have provided. So if you are talking about these libs, you= might be correct. But It would already be a great improvement to be able to build Flex applic= ations without manual intervention. I have to admit that I have never ever done any Air yet nor any of the Flex= guys around here that I have worked with. Don't get me wrong. I'm not claiming that Nobody uses Air ... it's just tha= t for those not using it this would be a great improvement. Chris -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. November 2012 17:26 An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: AW: Who's a flex compiler-configuration pro on this list? On 11/21/12 11:59 PM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" wrote: > Buuuuuut ... thinking of it :-) > > Mabe it would indeed be better to start with Falcon as this is=20 > definitely the future of Flex and Flexmojos already lets you build=20 > using MXMLC ... And I always wanted to start digging into it, but=20 > never actually found a usecase for it. > > @Alex: Perhaps if Adobe were to publish the playerglobal and the=20 > airglobal (Don't need the runtime ... think mavenizing the Runtim is=20 > too much ... would simply use the runtimes from PATH). > Without those TWO artifacts the final solution would always be=20 > half-baked (No matter what compiler) as no user could: "simply add the=20 > plugin and start coding flex" :-) So what do you think? You make the=20 > one thing happen, and I'll do the second? > ;-) > I need convincing that this will work for captive runtime for mobile apps, = and not sure how you are supposed to get the other executables that help ma= ke up the AIR package. But if you want to try prototyping it, feel free. I wll try to find time t= o help next week, if you need help. I want to make sure it will work befor= e we go ask for approvals. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui