Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebpatu.flex@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <50A7A98B.8050604@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:13:15 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?s=E9bastien_Paturel?= <sebpatu.flex@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flex 5 in haxe
References: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B35FF86@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
 <CCCC7556.46DB2%coxfrederic@gmail.com>
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B35FF9C@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
 <D84D2136-8297-4906-9A17-B58A173DCBB1@classsoftware.com>
 <50A74C1C.2060507@gmail.com>
 <CAOwcBfo0=FJ+E8=AXKvuaBv4_2X96VXzekEv=RsakCZy0aGL5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJRGrVvrJjriHdjj1ccNVk+LjbogtSjUtj6mM0hCXCFpLoVGkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A78F40.6010202@gmail.com>
 <CAJRGrVvc_kAtan4EgSXvv2xuV13QnMeOr3TPXATu3rTOt9_+oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A79724.9090500@gmail.com>
 <CAJRGrVt2e_ovZM4Pcg-yMjUR2c-oRBL5EKzmcRr-AKkzqpwQVg@mail.gmail.com>
 <50A7A195.8090603@gmail.com>
 <FD65E057-7A2F-42A6-AE35-42B891F29630@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <FD65E057-7A2F-42A6-AE35-42B891F29630@classsoftware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

maybe there was a misunderstanding here justin.
i was talking about HTML5 performances, not Flex.

so my question is:
can flex outputed to HTML/JS perform as good as flex outputed to flash 
runtimes?
maybe i could ask it another way: can the next flex (re written) 
outputed to HTML/JS perform as good as current flex outputed to flash 
runtimes?
If not, i would conclude that the use of Apache Cordova is not a good 
solution as a path to get rid of Adobes runtimes dependency.

Le 17/11/2012 15:54, Justin Mclean a �crit :
> Hi,
>
>> What i read here and there is that the performances are poor.
> Don't believe everything you read. Performance is good for most use cases. Can you write 60 fps full 3d games will millions of polygons on the screen at once in Flex? Probably not but then that's not what it's for. There were some  performance issue on mobile (scrolling big lists for instance) but that was greatly improved in Flex SDK 4.5 and 4.6 releases (and newer versions of AIR).
>
> I really can't see any JS/HTML performing any better in the same situations where Flex has issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin