Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <20121130162239.654059yyqsotg9zz@teotigraphix.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 16:22:39 -0500
From: Michael Schmalle <apache@teotigraphix.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Falcon SDKSWCTests
References: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B4CFCC9@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B4CFCD1@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5B4CFCD1@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=ISO-8859-1;
 DelSp="Yes";
 format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.11)

Gordon,

I entered bugs in JIRA for those, it's actually 2 tickets.

I will fix them. The first one is tricky and a bad set of code I was  
scared to change without afterwords running mustella.

I had to reformat my computer and haven't got mustella running again.  
Next week I can get on this. I am burnt out from all this js talk. :)

I could go head and start looking at the other SWCs to I am sure Cyril  
will give them a go as well.

Mike


Quoting Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com>:

> Whoops, the frameworkSWC() compilation test doesn't pass. There are  
> still four warnings:
>
> D:\Apache\incubator\flex\sdk\branches\develop\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\collections\ListCollectionView.as:1398
> Warning: variable definition duplicates function parameter: events.
> 						var events:Array = updatedItems[j].events;
> 						    ^
>
> D:\Apache\incubator\flex\sdk\branches\develop\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\utils\SHA256.as:111
> Warning: Initializer value 3144134277 for type 'int' must be between  
> -2147483648 and 2147483647 inclusive. An initial value of  
> -1150833019 will be used instead.
>             var h1:int = 0xbb67ae85;
>                          ^
>
> D:\Apache\incubator\flex\sdk\branches\develop\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\utils\SHA256.as:113
> Warning: Initializer value 2773480762 for type 'int' must be between  
> -2147483648 and 2147483647 inclusive. An initial value of  
> -1521486534 will be used instead.
>             var h3:int = 0xa54ff53a;
>                          ^
>
> D:\Apache\incubator\flex\sdk\branches\develop\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\utils\SHA256.as:115
> Warning: Initializer value 2600822924 for type 'int' must be between  
> -2147483648 and 2147483647 inclusive. An initial value of  
> -1694144372 will be used instead.
>             var h5:int = 0x9b05688c;
>                          ^
>
> These are examples of Falcon being pickier (and more correct) than  
> the old compiler.
>
> Any volunteers to fix the source code so that this test passes?
>
> - Gordon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gosmith@adobe.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:10 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Falcon SDKSWCTests
>
> @Cyril: Thanks for your help with introducing the compile-config.xml  
> files so that we can more easily make Falcon JUnit tests that  
> compile each SDK SWC.
>
> Now that we have one such test - for compiling framework.swc -  
> passing, would anybody like to work on investigating the status of  
> other tests that compile rpc.swc, mx.swc, spark.swc, etc.? We need  
> to figure out whether the SDK source code needs to change because  
> Falcon is pickier than the old compiler, or whether Falcon has AS  
> bugs that need to be fixed.
>
> - Gordon
>
>

-- 
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com