incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <>
Subject Re: [MENTORS] InstallApacheFlex RC9 Third-Party Licensing
Date Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:03:58 GMT

On 11/2/12 7:46 AM, "Carol Frampton" <> wrote:

> On 11/2/12 10 :28AM, "Carol Frampton" <> wrote:
>> I think there were a few issues raised and we need to know if any of them
>> are "release blockers"
>> 1.  incorrect headers in and
>> 2.  incorrect path to and in the LICENSE file
>> 3.  incorrect license for the open_sans fonts in the LICENSE file
> This should have said open-sans rather than open_sans.
> It looks like the Apache License, version 2.0 is correct for the Open Sans
> fonts, at least according to this [1].
> The copyright is Digitized data copyright © 2010-2011, Google Corporation
> but the license is Apache v2.
> I think that means we don't have to call the fonts out in the LICENSE file
> since the general Apache license applies to them.
That isn't clear to me so it would be great if Bertrand could decide.  If a
third-party entity is Apache Licensed but is an external to Apache does it
need mention in LICENSE.  And does the copyright go some place for binaries
like a .TTF file?

Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.

View raw message