incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject AW: AW: [POLL] Maven and Apache Flex
Date Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:27:20 GMT
Ok so this is good news :-)

Well perhaps some other guys could join the discussion, because currently I don't have an
idea how we want to enforce the accceptance of the licenses from the side of the download-server
- I mean on http level. 

My proposal for an automated downloader would take care of integrating the license acceptance
into the maven build, unfortunately it woudn't prevent someone from simply downloading the
stuff from the Adobe servers manually without accepting any license. What exaclty would "manage
the download server" mean? Are you allowed to place stuff in certain directories, or could
you setup stuff on the server itself? Just to sort of give the thoughts a direction. I still
think of a Nexus instance with creating/reactivating accounts linked to accepting the Licenses
of being the best and safest solution. It would definitely reduce the amount of work having
tob e done at Adobes side and we could simply rely on the existing maven features.

And to the point of Adobe not earning Money with it ... I would think of it as customer support.
After all ... as a european citizen I payed double the US price for my Adobe products, just
for hearing that they are dopping support for the parts I was interested in just a few weeks
after purchasing the update to the latest (and last) version. So I would treat this as post-product
support and it would definitely enlarge the chance of me being willing to give Adobe money
for any products they might create in the future :-)

Chris



-----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 19:37
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: [POLL] Maven and Apache Flex




On 11/28/12 10:01 AM, "christofer.dutz@c-ware.de"
<christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:

> Yeah ... I meant Adobe :-)
> 
> Well I think the form in which Adobe provides the stuff would be a 
> thing we could discuss ...
> I guess there are a lot of options.
> - The one side would be downloader-mojo simply downloading the normal 
> zip files containinig AIR SDK or Flash Player stuff and mavenizing 
> that on the client.
> - The other side would be downloading fully mavenized resources 
> directly from an Adobe server.
> I guess there could be a number of options inbetween too.
> 
> I would prefer the option with fully mavenized resources being 
> downloaded directly from Adobe, but I am assuming it would probably be 
> the other side that would be more realistic to hope for.
> (I think Adobe doesn't want to do anything to support us in regard of 
> Maven ... at least that's my current assumption).
Actually, I have the ok from Runtime product management to let me manage the download server
and place pom.xmls as needed.  But that's about it. And they want assurance that licenses
are being accepted before downloading.  So, if we can make this work by giving me or showing
me how to set up pom.xmls I will go ask for login credentials to the downloads server, setup
a couple of folders and we can start actually trying it.

Adobe does want to support us, but the fact is, Adobe isn't getting any money from this so
they aren't going to spend a lot of time on it.

> With this option it would be good if there was a systematic way of 
> providing them so we wouldn't have to maintain a mapping table for 
> mapping versions to URLs but could calculate the url.
> Something like
> "http://download.adobe.com/runtimes/flash/{flashversion}-{os}.zip" or 
> "http://download.adobe.com/runtimes/air/{airversion}-{os}.zip" would be great.
> Doesnt actually have to be that URL, just that we could calculate the 
> URL for it by setting "type" (flash/air), "version" and "os" (win/mac/lnx).
I believe I get to control a new set of folders containing runtime SDKs.
The runtime team will probably keep using their current scheme.  They will not update our
new folder area when a new release goes out so we will have to keep track and maintain that
ourselves.  But I think I can use whatever folder naming scheme you want to use.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 18:34
> An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [POLL] Maven and Apache Flex
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/28/12 8:23 AM, "Greg Reddin" <gredbug@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:49 AM, christofer.dutz@c-ware.de < 
>> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> What would you all think of the following solution:
>>> - Apache deploys the Apache Flex FDK artifacts in a public maven 
>>> repo (Without the Apache stuff you need a license for)
> Apache stuff or Adobe Stuff?
> 
>>> - In the maven-flex-plugin suite there is one mojo that binds to 
>>> mavens "initialize" phase and checks the availability of the Apache 
>>> artifacts. If they are missing it prompts the user if he accepts the 
>>> license agreement (An option to allow a non-interactive build would 
>>> be good for running on
>>> CI-Servers)
> So, if I understand correctly, you will use the presence of the Adobe 
> artifacts to skip prompting the user to accept the license?
> 
> That sounds good to me.  So then all Adobe needs to do is put pom.xml 
> files alongside the different AIR SDK downloads?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> 

--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message