Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jbalsas@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121023064751.20877a8s08vkuo5z@www.teotigraphix.com>
References: 
 <CACK5iZeyg7zORV6EsPDG=UsB=b1Hkdxca_YhYX45oXnKZQbXRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CCA5CC4F.11D97%timbert@adobe.com>
	<149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2A81@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
	<20121018182503.155250488ldctf3z@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2A9D@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
	<20121018184907.15754xvkf0ivzn8j@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2AD0@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
	<20121018192504.32414d3p9d77uj80@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<CAOAmsm6CUQLT5+Nz3B9bxeubrahdCwyZYHfhp9iSOZSyi=2M=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121019151853.12172akqveozbfrx@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2F8E@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
	<20121022163134.98536finv3io7j8m@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AFAE2DF@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
	<20121022165401.20322izbqxsydyll@www.teotigraphix.com>
	<CAOAmsm6A+kc=Hnro8qXCCGRF3L6RjRGNbQ=CxHjsueQgNOPRsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOAmsm6ZovsvY1g5ZuTFnknneEEAtX_XQHEBDqxLXTAO_imk-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20121023064751.20877a8s08vkuo5z@www.teotigraphix.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:34:30 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAOAmsm5tf4WpYcjCzQMSQTxtt17JH=KoQPZZtHU5ENNJORmvJw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)
From: Chema Balsas <jbalsas@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6da98c4780a1104ccb85a73

--0016e6da98c4780a1104ccb85a73
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> By far I am no JIRA expert for sure and the sub task question I can't
> answer. I does seem like a good way to spread a task between devs but
> having JIRA send emails for all the sub tsks seems like over kill since you
> all ready have the main task and others can watch it.


Maybe someone can suggest something better. Although not as clean as
subtasks, we could just update the comment where all the targets are listed
indicating which are converted and which ones are still in progress...


Chema, does the mustella run the build before it starts? I mean does it
> create the whole framework SWCs from scratch or does it use the existing?
>

No, the mustella tests do not run the framework build. It does run however
the tests (swf) builds unless you use the -rerun option.

The steps I followed were:

1. Run the sdk build
2. Run some mustella tests (only mx/utisl/ColorUtils) to check they were
passing
3. Run the specific compile target for mx so the mx.swc got replaced
4. Run again the mustella tests to check they were still passing

Also, for now I only got the mustella tests to run with "use_browser"
enabled. I assume there's something wrong with my trust file, but I'll get
a deeper look at that this weekend

-- 
Chema

--0016e6da98c4780a1104ccb85a73--