Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FC95D003 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83925 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 16:58:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83843 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 16:58:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 83834 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2012 16:58:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:58:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gredbug@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-ia0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:58:44 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id b35so4699422iac.6 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:58:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gH0iDm5RDP4Gm7ZMMEi7qOgmV1gKUTvr/k4710v/hy0=; b=PdfraKpxbcsJFW4vggIZFzQvxCRGP5W8JiFQBLWTax2MCr6KzzdkT+woaN1AjA96Vm n1PMUZhQGiNo1K0qKLTBsWvGDqniZokpZdZxQpwMdFAabzlNkaYXGFn4yQN3DvgTNQpC XJ3Qsy/fUy3B+L8NTzYny5fYWi8FxNkM24lAaotULtDjN5/yNBMyEtyRKOXNIUIUXfH3 1WxTfUXN55Lo3qz7DfF8Rmc9QbIFOq2nRRIRy8GmTs+C7uz+sa3tDy91GuRw3u1GQU+G RXRPu/65wtHe1N4yGw1eZeBPcNl7aIY4iAn4T3esUkWCmzUwN2l7C1OSuiwpga408TdA jasw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.158.201 with SMTP id ww9mr12976519igb.22.1350406704123; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.40.169 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:58:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <66E38C42347D6446BF7FCB22C3D3878072DFCE8C6B@ECCR06PUBLIC.exchange.local> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:58:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: AW: AW: Flex Maven FDK Generator RC1 From: Greg Reddin To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > I would find it hard to believe that every other Maven artifact in the world > has a permissive license. Do you know of any artifacts that have > proprietary licenses? How do they handle their licensing? If the general > rule is that there are no licensing prompts in Maven and I can point to > other Adobe-like corporations who are ok with that, then I have a better > chance of getting Adobe to pass on requiring licensing dialogs. > > I agree for now that having folks download the Adobe stuff first is "safer" > legally, but having all of these separate downloads is a pain point (and is > one of the good things about the Installer), so getting Adobe stuff to be > legitimate Maven dependencies is currently worth a try. With most projects I've been involved in I've had to manually download non-permissive stuff and host it in a company repo like Artifactory. I think it's a bit of an unfortunate fact of our existence that Flex, for a while at least, will be dependent on non-open source libraries like the Flash runtime. It may mean that somebody can't just declare a dependency to our code in their POM file and be off and running. We may have to document that users will need to manually download and install the Adobe stuff before the Flex code will be of any use to them. At least that's the worst case scenario. Greg