Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11AD3DCDF for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78188 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 16:12:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77903 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 16:12:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77877 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2012 16:12:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:12:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vorobyov.mikhail@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:12:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id eq6so560516obc.6 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:12:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=u+nOUkelS8sIgtak96rSykdHy1xB2ahFVKEMSbotYH4=; b=QklIxMCuBqImuSQ+LY5HhSTkp9Ez7b0Q333HfcN23KGRSGJ6Dk8I6kyDYg5aa7E/wq oH0ugqHDyBHhFX120KstQDYU8T4m3/ttJp7ZMhgDrX8P+MyKXk6A96QURuh9QbjzYDSh QZ29/2CAYMRO7AiuMO4KvvVbRQ7VIXkEDrS9Kn2pvwluseRATluyM1L22EtTn32JXx0C zdhkHlIO6+aszdQ4f/Df9ZQOhbpdMi9SJ8btWS0+S9hMwrHMNB0rVovdwgvyMwjDhTLn tW+vLpXiw5RweNKTSSIqweZoy0IA7QYB+uLXh7TCpK0otYX/kfW158RiuTnNSHRk3GVo viJA== Received: by 10.60.171.10 with SMTP id aq10mr1496231oec.131.1350663138938; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:12:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.128.10 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:11:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mikhail Vorobyov Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:11:58 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 1.0 - RC7 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d3f0c9b8eae04cc6bc43d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54d3f0c9b8eae04cc6bc43d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why don't you want to set AIR 3.4 and playerglobal11_4.swc for downloading but only 3.1 and 11.1? 2012/10/19 Om > It is not about 7 RCs. The 7th RC just got enough votes and we are going > to promote it to an actual release. > > Close to 20 people voted +1 and we got 2 -1s. As a release manager, I > think this is good enough for a release. > > The issue is not blocker since there is an obvious workaround. And there > are no security implications. > > I would rather release now than wait for yet another arbitrary deadline > (4.8.1) > > Thanks, > Om > On Oct 19, 2012 8:06 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > I'm not going to change my vote at this point, but consider these point= s: > > > > 1) Why would doing a point release right after be less work and get mor= e > > involvement? > > 2) Why do we think we will get two other mentor/IPMC votes if they revi= ew > > the dev-list and see this issue? > > 3) Why do we think we will get mentor/IPMC attention again right away > with > > a > > follow-up point release > > 4) I have seen this issue twice in English, but wasn't able to reproduc= e > > it. > > 5) I would rather the next installer release coincide with a new Apache > > Flex > > SDK release like a 4.8.1 in a month or so from now. > > > > To me, 7 RC's is not a lot. Sometimes, important bugs get found late i= n > > the > > game. Sure, it is frustrating, but you will certainly get enough PPMC > > votes > > on an RC8. However, right now we are waiting on getting IPMC votes and= I > > don't know why they would vote just to get something out the door if it > > isn't handling strings properly. > > > > > > On 10/19/12 5:51 AM, "Stefan Horochovec" > > wrote: > > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > The installer works, as I spent the walkthrough in JIRA and in my las= t > > > email, that information may be contained on the page to access the > > > Installer. > > > > > > I upgraded my vote to -1 because I have found a bug. I shared the sam= e > > > opinion of Christophe Herreman, it=C2=B4s my opinion too. Where he sa= id: > > > > > > "I'm not trying to be negative. I'm just worried that this will lead = to > > > frustration and a feeling of low quality coming from Apache Flex to t= he > > > users." > > > > > > But I also agree with you that we need this release which is being > > awaited > > > for so long, and for sure will help many people to have the new Apach= e > > Flex > > > SDK. > > > > > > Erik and Om > > > > > > I opened a ticket [1] in JIRA with the comparison of the translations > of > > > languages available today, and put them separate group with all the > > > messages. I would suggest this as the default for new messages, to ma= ke > > it > > > easier to find what should be done the translation, because when you > add > > a > > > new key, you can already tag them in an area of translation for each > > > language. The work of comparing one by one consuming too much time. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33224 > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Stefan Horochovec > > > > > > > > > 2012/10/19 Christophe Herreman > > > > > >> OK all, thanks for the feedback. I agree that we need to release oft= en > > and > > >> early, although in certain cases it doesn't feel quite right. > > >> > > >> Since there are no blocking issues, a release is justified I guess. > > >> > > >> +1 (binding) > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> Christophe > > >> > > >> 2012/10/19 Om > > >> > > >>> This issue will be fixed in the next release. > > >>> > > >>> I know and agree that this is not perfect, but we cannot delay a > > release > > >>> till we get everything perfect. We will never release anything if = we > > >> wait > > >>> to fix every issue that we discover. > > >>> > > >>> This is not a release blocker issue, nor does it have security > > >>> implications. We cannot delay the release any longer especially > after > > so > > >>> many people have voted for the release. > > >>> > > >>> The patch has been contributed and it will be committed asap. We > will > > be > > >>> making a follow up release soon. Also, we are shipping with an aut= o > > >> update > > >>> mechanism that will ensure that folks get the subsequent releases f= or > > >> sure. > > >>> > > >>> Thanks, > > >>> Om > > >>> On Oct 19, 2012 1:57 AM, "Christophe Herreman" < > > >>> christophe.herreman@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Sorry about this, but why would you release the installer in it's > > >> current > > >>>> state? I know there is a lot of "pressure" and excitement to get > this > > >>>> released, but there are currently clearly some bigger issues with > the > > >>>> proposed RC in terms of translations. > > >>>> > > >>>> IMO it's better to delay the release until the most serious issues > are > > >>>> fixed than to release now, knowing that it will cause problems for > > >>> (perhaps > > >>>> a minor part of ) the users. > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm not trying to be negative. I'm just worried that this will lea= d > to > > >>>> frustration and a feeling of low quality coming from Apache Flex t= o > > the > > >>>> users. > > >>>> > > >>>> kind regards, > > >>>> Christophe > > >>>> > > >>>> 2012/10/19 Carlos Rovira > > >>>> > > >>>>> Yes...please, release.... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2012/10/19 Omar Gonzalez : > > >>>>>> Release, release, release!!! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -omar > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thursday, October 18, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Stefan, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I understand the problem, and I see the implications. That's wh= y > I > > >>>>>>> push for a quick "point" update AFTER this release, to adress > this > > >>> and > > >>>>>>> other known issues. In fact, I'll enter your fix into the sourc= e > > >>> this > > >>>>>>> weekend, if it checks out. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> However, I sense that after 7 (!) release candidates, a kind of > > >>> 'vote > > >>>>>>> fatigue' is setting in. By this I mean that if we do another RC= , > I > > >>>>>>> think we might not get enough votes just because people will no= t > > >>>>>>> bother to enter theirs again (and again, and again). > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I therefor recommend that we use the votes we now have to do a > > >>>> release. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> EdB > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Stefan Horochovec > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> Erik > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> It's possible to run the installer in operating systems that > > >> have > > >>>>>>> language > > >>>>>>>> available on Installer and that is different from en_US, > > >> however, > > >>>>> have to > > >>>>>>>> be done the process of changing the language of the installer > > >> for > > >>>>> en_US. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> If you try to install and don't change the language to en_US, > > >> the > > >>>>>>>> installation dont work. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Log of installation (sorry, in portuguese): > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Buscado o espelho da URL de download do SDK a partir do CGI. > > >>>>>>>> Criando diret=C3=B3rio do Apache Flex > > >>>>>>>> Criando diret=C3=B3rio tempor=C3=A1rio > > >>>>>>>> N=C3=A3o foi poss=C3=ADvel criar o diret=C3=B3rio tempor=C3=A1= rio > > >>>>>>>> Instala=C3=A7=C3=A3o abortada > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> And here you can see the steps: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 1 - > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12549807/step1.png > > >>>>>>>> 2 - > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12549808/step2.png > > >>>>>>>> 3 - > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12549809/step3.png > > >>>>>>>> 4 - > > >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12549810/step4.png > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> In my opinion, this is a very critical problem, a time may com= e > > >>> that > > >>>>>>> affect > > >>>>>>>> a large number of people. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Stefan Horochovec > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> 2012/10/19 Erik de Bruin > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Stefan, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for your contribution! As we discussed, I'll look > > >> into > > >>>> your > > >>>>>>>>> patches as soon as I can, and I'm sure they will prove valid > > >> and > > >>>>>>>>> useful. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Would you agree that if we do an update soon, lack of true > > >>>>>>>>> internationalisation shouldn't be a deal breaker for this fir= st > > >>>>>>>>> release? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> EdB > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Horochovec > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> -1 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> My first test was done in an environment in English, but > > >> when I > > >>>>>>> changed > > >>>>>>>>> my > > >>>>>>>>>> OS to my local language (Portuguese), to test the > > >> translations, > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> result > > >>>>>>>>>> was not good. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> In step where are defined which license will be accepted, > > >> just > > >>> no > > >>>>>>> option > > >>>>>>>>> on > > >>>>>>>>>> the left appears only when the switch is made the selected > > >>>>> language. > > >>>>>>> Ex: > > >>>>>>>>>> change to english, and then go back to my default language. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I submitted the bug in JIRA, and also submitted a patch > > >> (which > > >>> if > > >>>>>>>>> accepted) > > >>>>>>>>>> causes the installer to load the translation of default > > >>> language > > >>>> of > > >>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> installer and then load the installation user's language, so > > >>> when > > >>>>>>> getting > > >>>>>>>>>> some text missing will interface with all texts, some not > > >>>>> translated. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> This whole environment is only valid when the Installer is > > >>>> launched > > >>>>>>> on an > > >>>>>>>>>> operating system that contains a translation and the same is > > >>>>> detected > > >>>>>>> by > > >>>>>>>>>> the installer before being read keys for translation into > > >>>> English. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33223 > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Stefan Horochovec > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> 2012/10/18 Om > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I will wait one more day for Dave Fisher to vote here. > > >> After > > >>>>> that I > > >>>>>>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>>>> post the vote thread on general. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Om > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Carol Frampton < > > >>>>> cframpto@adobe.com > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Carlos Rovira > > >>>>> Director de Tecnolog=C3=ADa > > >>>>> M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > >>>>> F: +34 912 35 57 77 > > >>>>> http://www.codeoscopic.com > > >>>>> http://www.directwriter.es > > >>>>> http://www.avant2.es > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Christophe Herreman > > >>>> http://www.herrodius.com > > >>>> http://www.springactionscript.org > > >>>> http://www.as3commons.org > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Christophe Herreman > > >> http://www.herrodius.com > > >> http://www.springactionscript.org > > >> http://www.as3commons.org > > >> > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > > > --bcaec54d3f0c9b8eae04cc6bc43d--