Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9627298A8 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 13:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33038 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 13:53:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32996 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 13:53:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 32988 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 13:53:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:53:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:53:00 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ez10so513629vbb.6 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=V/KGFCr8VymwSbGQwIwMWS9B+4LDVYHq1BZkQSOimB4=; b=THDkhgkrxXAlApcFucaeczoaVCufi+ASuda/KxK8ZLyRdpWA89hOkCQr/D0OC49ZhT JV9im+tUDWuZHVxGnmAAhfBvzawMbqx2yZiBQbuDK+qs+WnywS7bZGYOUaVf23ARdaF3 Zm3Ptk2an9llMGKH97ag1qhpsuJZAkq5rkxAjfO3LHqbXU/rerWGtrJoZ8KnZrZiT6zi NAa/8r18EJLcinSMbuZamZp5tawExwutf78wvaiekoBNdRyx7lSr/tj0l17RoDExksTJ Ki8ij3b+EWvXwO1nnJMeVp9f5oTHKgJMqM3msjO9RoxSfHODF5zvJxNQkBbdMtreMMoR 5SCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.148.134 with SMTP id p6mr3172304vcv.3.1349358758371; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.239.164 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121004094332.21812ohg1plgmdms@www.teotigraphix.com> References: <19D3AA45-EAB7-4384-BB23-B6730D71B01C@gmail.com> <9FC0126A-844E-433B-9B42-8CDF10B8E9E5@gmail.com> <20121004094332.21812ohg1plgmdms@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [POLL] tag (was: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the more attractive Apache Flex becomes") From: Roland Zwaga To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be1d477a1dc04cb3c114d X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKIZ3a/Bpn/R13ja26xsPqWbq4OqsIxEK0y1mzNQ2oCnytBfFvqWjaXhduv8aCk9K1Ipnl X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043be1d477a1dc04cb3c114d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > I'm not voting on this but, I understand the tension here, I would bet a > great deal of money on the effort put into getting Adobe to release source > code for FC or the Visual Editor of FB is never going to happen. Alex in > his own way has hinted at this in a couple of emails. > > Why this thread even exists is beyond me Sabatian, didn't the thread about > creating a visual designer that exists and was being talked about between 2 > involved committers kind of preempt this? > > Before anybody goes bashing me, just note I am not putting an ounce of > hope or thought into FlashCatalyst or FlashBuilder's DesignView becoming > Apache Flex's design view savior. > > In the eternal words of those that don't like to waste time, cut your > losses and move on. > I'm afraid I agree with Mike here. Adobe has already indicated that Flash Catalyst is EOL-ed, I really don't see any real chance that they will change their minds... Roland --f46d043be1d477a1dc04cb3c114d--