Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9562EDA20 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:56:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 67884 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 04:56:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67739 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2012 04:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67710 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2012 04:56:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:56:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-da0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Oct 2012 04:55:51 +0000 Received: by mail-da0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s35so1967893dak.6 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=7EVB6kT3+KF0ic+Xc3kIJg2h3j6hPzKweRLpeYvDhCU=; b=ZnXSlrGSR6YySz1O1nOFpQZ+MobW30MNohvXwPKh+GRVU9tgToRihuiusqPohO3tMc QNy28eyPRrBSrBIMJ0rszjjCt+w1wux1O85ulSpH12a85dnkmDzddl3IK1VcDyu1FNfj 352vmotwg+toUdxTppLO+dz8oyBVlJNU/0daRrQCQu4hj48TaV9XVCdt5RUGt87aZG+J GPM3nYUdxBBSvnfyRBXs+hq+CNlSFdYxvK3F7RCV4XOIxSyFl2IAoXIAr6Sy4x3j4vzm MLsVYa0Ypz5oN6uSpe70ZpLKOB+WcNpLLEqA4ZEt5D84sqfo15c9TPkKkb3VmwEUZ4W6 La9w== Received: by 10.68.227.162 with SMTP id sb2mr91181003pbc.4.1351486527749; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (124-169-16-129.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.169.16.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sf4sm5346583pbc.75.2012.10.28.21.55.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 21:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Subject: Re: About Flex runtime From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:55:20 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3D95A07D-E2A1-40CF-9778-87FF8E9504F3@classsoftware.com> References: To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmKEbVZXYGA0tc+Qzh7OSx4fsygO+kSks8s1d6qF9vsgHEawDfZsLO3FB21zRbabxGj+Z9b X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > The SDK should not need to be built for particular player versions. Currently 4.8 requires 11.1 (specified as minimum player version in = flex-config.xml) which means as far as I'm aware you can't compile an = application using the current SDK and make it run in flash player 11.0 = or below. To do so you need to recompile the SDK against the version = (say 11.0) you want to run it in. Am I mistaken here? Would compiling the SDK for a higher version of the flash player give = you possible performance benefits as it also changes the swf version = (also specified in the flex-config.xml)? Thanks, Justin=