Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41F47DB04 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61597 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 15:20:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61553 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2012 15:20:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 61544 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 15:20:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:20:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.167.147.50] (HELO franklin.liquidweb.com) (69.167.147.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:20:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53657) by franklin.liquidweb.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TJnD9-0004AL-6W for flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:19:39 -0400 Received: from 64.222.158.177 ([64.222.158.177]) by www.teotigraphix.com (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:19:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20121004111938.15777fkepk8xxo22@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:19:38 -0400 From: Michael Schmalle To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [POLL] tag (was: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the more attractive Apache Flex becomes") References: <19D3AA45-EAB7-4384-BB23-B6730D71B01C@gmail.com> <9FC0126A-844E-433B-9B42-8CDF10B8E9E5@gmail.com> <20121004094332.21812ohg1plgmdms@www.teotigraphix.com> <20121004102832.27334zo9krfkkiz4@www.teotigraphix.com> In-Reply-To: <20121004102832.27334zo9krfkkiz4@www.teotigraphix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.11) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - franklin.liquidweb.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - incubator.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - teotigraphix.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Since my tone was being questioned, how am I as a volunteer supposed to react to a statement like this? " I still doubt, though, that this designing and skinning tool, you are proposing, can be created by one person alone. If the Adobe Catalyst team couldn't finish Flash Catalyst within 4 years of development, how could you possibly do that just on your own? " Who says I am working alone in the Apache Flex project? How did the conversation between Om, I and others prompt a statement like this? Mike Quoting Michael Schmalle : > Quoting Jonathan Campos : > >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Michael Schmalle >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not voting on this but, I understand the tension here, I would bet a >>> great deal of money on the effort put into getting Adobe to release source >>> code for FC or the Visual Editor of FB is never going to happen. Alex in >>> his own way has hinted at this in a couple of emails. >>> >>> Why this thread even exists is beyond me Sabatian, didn't the thread about >>> creating a visual designer that exists and was being talked about between 2 >>> involved committers kind of preempt this? >>> >>> Before anybody goes bashing me, just note I am not putting an ounce of >>> hope or thought into FlashCatalyst or FlashBuilder's DesignView becoming >>> Apache Flex's design view savior. >>> >>> In the eternal words of those that don't like to waste time, cut your >>> losses and move on. >>> >> >> While I don't agree with the tone I do agree that I don't see a point to >> this poll. If you want a visual editor start building it. If people like it >> then it will be picked up. It's that simple. >> >> -- >> Jonathan Campos >> > > There is really no tone, it more coming from the fact that there is > a conversation about solving a problem, he doesn't want to be > involved in solving that problem from the perspective of what people > can do that are involved with the Apache Flex project. > > That survey existed 10 months ago and nothing has changed, we only > have Alex basically saying no way, no how 10 months later. > > Sabatian, I did catch one of your comments regarding our "design > view" project and you basically said with a couple people involved > it's impossible and that is why you are continuing the push to get > FlashCatalyst in CS7 or whatever version you said. > > The way I see it is there are major circuits and cross talk > happening and it's diluting the substance of trying to solve a > problem. > > Mike > > -- Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com http://blog.teotigraphix.com