Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates
 64.18.1.181 as permitted sender)
From: Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:35:00 -0700
Subject: RE: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)
Thread-Topic: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)
Thread-Index: Ac2xTo7BeeYrzJdGQT+Zr/506a0RnQCUYuZw
Message-ID: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AFAEC9D@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
References: <CCAC3444.1DC55%cframpto@adobe.com>
	<20121023115630.41116tc187d58mr2@www.teotigraphix.com>
 <CAOAmsm5fo-dDf84O9n3+e_BHuJvXEumhyoD1ENHm11UQMQVk5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOAmsm5fo-dDf84O9n3+e_BHuJvXEumhyoD1ENHm11UQMQVk5g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

What's the status of this work? Do we have a config file for framework.swc =
yet that I can use in a Falcon JUnit test? If so, I'd like to get it checke=
d in even if we don't switch over the build.xml file yet to use it.

- Gordon


-----Original Message-----
From: Chema Balsas [mailto:jbalsas@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2012 11:45 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: compc config adjustements (was RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon)

Sorry if I made a bit of a mess here...

I think the wiki sounds good, but we'll probably be adding more complexity =
to the workflow.

Mike, if you are allowed to assign the tasks to yourself, I'd suggest that =
we create the subtasks. You or any other committer that wants to work on on=
e, just needs to assign it to himself. For the rest of us, we can just comm=
ent on the task saying that we're taking over and that should do it.

Does that sound reasonable? What do you think?

Thanks everyone for the input!

2012/10/23 Michael Schmalle <apache@teotigraphix.com>

> Well ironically after sending the last message it finally(4 hours=20
> later after man tries) downloaded all build stuff, thanks for the info Ca=
rol.
>
> Mike
>
>
> Quoting Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>:
>
>
>>
>> On 10/23/12 11 :39AM, "Michael Schmalle" <apache@teotigraphix.com> wrote=
:
>>
>>  Quoting Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>  I believe Alex can help you with setting up your JIRA account to be
>>>> able to
>>>> assign stuff to yourself.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This isn't a problem, I can do this already.
>>>
>>>  As for non-committers, a comment saying 'I am on it'  should be
>>>> sufficient.  Regularly updating tasks/sub-tasks with progress=20
>>>> updates would also be helpful in case someone else wants to=20
>>>> continue from where things are.
>>>>
>>>> This is an issue I struggled with at the beginning as well.  It=20
>>>> became easier as I got used to the process  and stuck to it.
>>>>
>>>> Take a look at FLEX-33106 for an example of how multiple developers=20
>>>> worked together by creating sub tasks and posting regular progress=20
>>>> updates.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah I see you have sub tasks and a lot of dialog back and forth.
>>>
>>> I can't even get the framework to build because of the osmf not=20
>>> downloading, just one of those days.
>>>
>>
>> Download it from here:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/osmf.adobe/<http://sourceforge.net/
>> projects/osmf.adobe/>
>>
>>
>> extract osmf.swc and put it in {root}/framework/libs
>>
>> The build file will see it is there and not try to download it.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>  Thanks,
>>>> Om
>>>> On Oct 23, 2012 8:16 AM, "Michael Schmalle"=20
>>>> <apache@teotigraphix.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Quoting Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I don't have permission as a committer? I created the task and
>>>>>>> assigned it to myself, am I missing something? I know I can't=20
>>>>>>> assign a task to Chema since he is not a listed user.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it wasn't you then it was Chema that said he couldn't can't=20
>>>>>> assign a task.  If he is one of the people working on this how is=20
>>>>>> he suppose to indicate this if he can't assign the task to=20
>>>>>> himself?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At this point I'm staying out of this.  You guys can figure out=20
>>>>>> how you want to do it.  I was just trying to help but I only seem=20
>>>>>> to have complicated matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I'm listening to what you are saying, and your not=20
>>>>> complicating things. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm new to this stuff to be honest and I'm just looking for a=20
>>>>> little guidance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chema wanted to help, so he went ahead and tried to find all the=20
>>>>> files that needed to be updated.
>>>>>
>>>>> He then just tired to create sub tasks himself to organize the effort=
.
>>>>> I
>>>>> think he didn't realize he couldn't assign tasks to himself.
>>>>>
>>>>> So I think the question is how actually a committer and=20
>>>>> contributor can work on something together as large as this task=20
>>>>> is and communicate to each other what the other is doing so we=20
>>>>> don't duplicate work.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com=20
>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC http://www.teotigraphix.com=20
>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> --
> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>
>


--
Chema