Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EBBAD071 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80806 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 18:47:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80759 invoked by uid 500); 19 Oct 2012 18:47:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80750 invoked by uid 99); 19 Oct 2012 18:47:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:47:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.35 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.35] (HELO exprod6og115.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:47:45 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUIGgOoZdRsEhrH7E4i2AGO7avvYMMqIm@postini.com; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:47:24 PDT Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q9JIlLKd009120 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nacas03.corp.adobe.com (nacas03.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.121]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q9JIlKXL008755 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nambx05.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.124]) by nacas03.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.121]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:47:20 -0700 From: Gordon Smith To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:47:19 -0700 Subject: RE: To AS4 or not (was: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon) Thread-Topic: To AS4 or not (was: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon) Thread-Index: Ac2uIqkL5rbc4QgtRDudXR1bz7pLegAAEbR6AAG95HA= Message-ID: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2C4F@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've seen the final spec. It should be easier to transcode AS4 to other lan= guages, compared with AS3. - Gordon -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20 Sent: Friday, October 19, 2012 10:56 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: To AS4 or not (was: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon) On 10/19/12 10:52 AM, "Jo=E3o Fernandes" wrote: > Alex, couldn't we simply use AS4 and have multiple target platforms ? Sure, but I think it will be a lot of work, for little gain. I'm waiting f= or the final AS4 spec. It might be harder to transcode it to other languag= es than AS3. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui