Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBE54D6F7 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38143 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 21:17:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38112 invoked by uid 500); 15 Oct 2012 21:17:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38102 invoked by uid 99); 15 Oct 2012 21:17:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:17:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.185 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.185] (HELO exprod6og103.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:17:19 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob103.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUHx9SfoAgFTQACS+dnCiW91qaq81XZ5J@postini.com; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:58 PDT Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.sea.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q9FLGuKd010960 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q9FLGtNc013537 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:55 -0700 Received: from nambx05.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.124]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%11]) with mapi; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:55 -0700 From: Gordon Smith To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:16:54 -0700 Subject: RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon Thread-Topic: ASC 2.0 and Falcon Thread-Index: Ac2jNq2doy24bcpcRCuPwRu5x7KqwgH4pygQ Message-ID: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B5AEB2096@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> References: <30ED8AC4-EECB-4631-A9EA-718C87612E9C@esri.com> In-Reply-To: <30ED8AC4-EECB-4631-A9EA-718C87612E9C@esri.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yes, ASC 2.0 is essentially a fork of Falcon. (More accurately, Falcon was = branched off back in the summer and the packages were renamed from com.adob= e.flash to org.apache.flex.) As far as I know, I'll be integrating these bu= gfixes into Falcon at some point. - Gordon -----Original Message----- From: Dasa Paddock [mailto:dpaddock@esri.com]=20 Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 1:19 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: ASC 2.0 and Falcon ASC 2.0 is getting lots of bug fixes and enhancements. See the release note= s at: http://labsdownload.adobe.com/pub/labs/flashplatformruntimes/air3-4/air3-4_= p3_sdk_asc2_releasenotes.pdf Is it correct that ASC 2.0 is a fork of Falcon? Is it possible that Adobe will be committing these same fixes to Falcon? Regards, Dasa