incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesus Barquin <yuka...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:56:39 GMT
So... is there anybody at apache flex that can follow the flash runtime
evolution??? I mean improving future apache flex compiler, because the
runtime seems to be every day more and more far away from the apache flex
way and I feel a little bit scared.

2012/10/18 Thibault Imbert <timbert@adobe.com>

> Hi Clint,
>
> No, we have no plans.
>
> Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM,
> Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems
> gaming.adobe.com <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org
> <http://bytearray.org/> | @thibault_imbert
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/17/12 11:04 PM, "Clint Modien" <clint@vectorscape.com> wrote:
>
> >This obviously begs the questionĊ  does Adobe plan on donating any changes
> >to ASC 2.0 back to Apache Flex?
> >
> >On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:28 PM, Thibault Imbert <timbert@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> Yes, we wanted to give you access to the compiler as soon as possible so
> >> we decided to donate the final version of the compiler (aka Falcon) with
> >> Flex (MXML) support that you guys could contribute to it and shape
> >>Falcon
> >> the way Flex developers decide to.
> >>
> >> ASC 2.0 purpose was gaming focused, hence why we decided to pursue the
> >> development on our side. Given that its audience today is different we
> >> don't want to have gaming requirements for the compiler get in the way
> >>of
> >> requirements from Flex developers.
> >>
> >> Thibault Imbert | sr. product manager gaming (Graphics, Language, VM,
> >> Compiler) | Monocle | adobe systems
> >> gaming.adobe.com <http://gaming.adobe.com/> | bytearray.org
> >> <http://bytearray.org/> | @thibault_imbert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/15/12 3:20 PM, "labriola@digitalprimates.net"
> >> <labriola@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Yes, ASC 2.0 is essentially a fork of Falcon. (More accurately, Falcon
> >>>> was branched off back in the summer and the packages were renamed from
> >>>> com.adobe.flash to org.apache.flex.) As far >as I know, I'll be
> >>>> integrating these bugfixes into Falcon at some point.
> >>>
> >>> So, essentially, adobe donated a snap shot in time of falcon and is
> >>> continuing development in a closed source manner. Is this accurate?
> >>>
> >>> Mike
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message