incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kéven Boily <kbo...@tribalnova.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the more attractive Apache Flex becomes"
Date Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:34:17 GMT
That makes me think about Monster Debugger (http://demonsterdebugger.com/).
That's one of my favorite external tool when debugging. Of course you have
to use it in conjonction with your code, but it's a simple swc to include
and a one line init call.

The tutorial is really awesome, I suggest you try it out!
*
Kéven Boily*
Développeur
*tribalnova*
4398, boul. Saint-Laurent, bureau 310
Montréal, Québec H2W 1Z5
kboily@tribalnova.com
www.tribalnova.com



On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> +1Note: A friend of mine wrote a visual tool in Flex 3 that's able to read
> and modified the properties and styles of a running application, actually,
> the actual use of this tools is to be integrated in a application but with
> little changes, that could be the application that could be loaded in the
> tool.I modified it recently to make it work with the SDK 4.8 and modules, I
> also mavenized it.The project and code can be found here
> http://code.google.com/p/fxspy/ (that's the Flex 3 version, my work
> hasn't been re-integrated yet to be tested and the tests are good then it
> should happen soon).May be you can have some interests using this base code
> to do something at design time, this license is WTFPL, probably the more
> permissive.
> Frédéric THOMAS
>  > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:50:28 +0200
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] "The more designer tools exist for Apache Flex, the
> more attractive Apache Flex becomes"
> > From: bdelacretaz@apache.org
> > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Sebastian Mohr <masuland@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > ...Please vote to approve the assumption (in the subject):...
> >
> > Note that the [VOTE] subject tag is meant for decisions made by a
> > project's PMC, in this case a [POLL] would have been more appropriate.
> > People who only care about [VOTE]s might complain ;-)
> >
> > No big deal, just wanted to mention it.
> >
> > -Bertrand
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message