incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 1.0 - RC8
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:52:38 GMT
That's even better, I don't think it's a problem but I don't use Windows.

-omar

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:

> Agreed. Just to make sure: Windows has a problem with spaces in app
> names? If not, why not make it a nice, readable "Apache Flex SDK
> Installer"?
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez
> <omarg.developer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd
> name.
> > ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those
> lines.
> >
> > -omar
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> >
> >> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
> >> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that
> >> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in
> >> it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or
> >> the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while
> >> it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names?
> >>
> >> All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which
> >> I feel very strong about.
> >>
> >> EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary.
>  At
> >> > any
> >> >> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to
> qualify
> >> > some
> >> >> other aspect of the release.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > It is not the name I am worried about.   It is about directory in
> which
> >> it
> >> > will get installed under.
> >> >
> >> > Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we
> >> > should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache
> Flex/InstallApacheFlex.
> >> > This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Om
> >> >
> >> >> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same
> time
> >> > and
> >> >> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is
> clear
> >> > what
> >> >> it is going to install.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > You know I'm always up for another RC :-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > EdB
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
> >> >> >> hans@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> +1. Great job, definitely!
> >> >> >>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally
> think
> >> > the
> >> >> >>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex"
but it
> >> > should be
> >> >> >>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK
> Installer",
> >> >> >>> especially for the first official release.
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> You make too much sense :-)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This sounds easy enough to do.   And if we dont do it now,
we
> wont be
> >> > able
> >> >> >> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> RC9 okay with folks?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> Om
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <--
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message