incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omar Gonzalez <omarg.develo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 1.0 - RC8
Date Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:39:14 GMT
Might as well fix the app name itself... InstallApacheFlex is an odd name.
ApacheFlexSDKInstaller makes much more sense or something along those lines.

-omar

On Tuesday, October 23, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:

> Ah, a Windows thing ;-) I really didn't see the point, but had no
> objection... but I'm on a Mac. On Windows, yes, I totally agree that
> it should be in a general directory 'Apache Flex', but maybe not in
> it's own subdirectory, but in a directory 'utilities'? And are we (or
> the Installer installer) creating shortcuts in the Start menu (while
> it lasts...) and on the Desktop? If so, what are their names?
>
> All this ties very strongly with the "first impressions" thing, which
> I feel very strong about.
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:10 AM, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 23, 2012 10:36 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm ok with reviewing another RC, but I don't think it is necessary.  At
> > any
> >> point in time, we might want to change its name again later to qualify
> > some
> >> other aspect of the release.
> >>
> >
> > It is not the name I am worried about.   It is about directory in which
> it
> > will get installed under.
> >
> > Instead of installing under Program Files(x86)/InstallApacheFlex/, we
> > should install it under Program Files(x86)/Apache Flex/InstallApacheFlex.
> > This will help be more organized when we release more utilities/tools.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >> I hope for the next SDK release the installer releases at the same time
> > and
> >> shows up in the web page right under it source packages so it is clear
> > what
> >> it is going to install.
> >>
> >> On 10/23/12 10:27 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> > You know I'm always up for another RC :-)
> >> >
> >> > EdB
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
> >> >> hans@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> +1. Great job, definitely!
> >> >>> Looks and functions good enough for now, although I reeeeally think
> > the
> >> >>> name of the application should not be "InstallApacheFlex" but it
> > should be
> >> >>> in a folder "Apache Flex" and be called "Apache Flex SDK Installer",
> >> >>> especially for the first official release.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >> You make too much sense :-)
> >> >>
> >> >> This sounds easy enough to do.   And if we dont do it now, we wont
be
> > able
> >> >> to do this in subsequent releases without causing confusion.
> >> >>
> >> >> RC9 okay with folks?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Om
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 19:49, Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as>
> > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> +1 (Binding)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Good work again guys.  Excited to tell the world about it ;)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> -Nick
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Hans | dotdotcommadot <
> >> >>>> hans@dotdotcommadot.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> This is true.
> >> >>>>> When you build with a different certificate,
> >> >>>>> you always need to delete the previous installed version
of an
> >> >>> application
> >> >>>>> in order to install the new version.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 23 Oct 2012, at 17:21, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> This might be the issue where you need to uninstall
a previous
> > version
> >> >>>>>> of the app first. Om explained something about certificates...
> Om?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> EdB
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>><

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message