incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>
Subject RE: ASC 2.0 and Falcon
Date Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:22:23 GMT
1. Port the Flex framework to AS4 and the new runtime.
2. Compile MXML either to AS4 (and then compile it with the new Adobe compiler) or, preferably,
compile MXML directly to the new bytecode for the new runtime.

- Gordon

-----Original Message-----
From: Clint Modien [mailto:clint@vectorscape.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:30 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon

It wasn't... but thanks for the response... :)

Also after running a search I remembered someone (Jonathan Campos, and Nick Kwiatkowski) did
some work to port Flex to starling... based on their initial investigation it seemed possible.

Question for Adobe... how would we compile it for as4?

Architecturally, would it make more sense to separate the compilers two different jobs?

Have mxmlc just generate AS3/4 and then invoke the appropriate adobe compiler on the generated
ActionScript?


On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com> wrote:

> Is that a question? If so, the answer is Yes.
> 
> - Gordon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clint Modien [mailto:clint@vectorscape.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:41 PM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: ASC 2.0 and Falcon
> 
> To clarify... this will mean Flex won't run in avm3 but Flash Player will still run Flex
fine in avm2.
> 
> On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Thibault Imbert <timbert@adobe.com> wrote:
> 
>> Just a heads up, given the architecture changes of the next-gen 
>> runtime, Flex will not be able to run in it.
> 


Mime
View raw message