Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E86BD6E5 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 03:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41415 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 03:56:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41295 invoked by uid 500); 12 Sep 2012 03:56:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 41269 invoked by uid 99); 12 Sep 2012 03:56:25 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 03:56:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of pepe.fxug@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 03:56:17 +0000 Received: by eaad12 with SMTP id d12so532987eaa.6 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FgAtr1QQNxad6bovZ5MiLTgLKbfhRmcFDy4f6t/4980=; b=biqDbHXRvfo98IZDeCScMysR+tY1imM2CFcBWyQNG/wFiEy1zbCG8ze3XICfY97arR KSpjWqkqVKr6QErODWwRaa6TzdEs7y3adxe/jyn2TxgFA5RDBX+RMz/sJpL0Faivquio uSj50l+66UFWx+Co0Qh1CD3I8VhRNhHH+YXjfpTEwQPzUGfIVt9LltAKdvdR2/T2tjiZ Y3hJXB9rWvEgZU0hALX2mdXgp0mi0NXYSp4s0+aUf9qEl5mZ6/Zm+XbwCiFf9TxsgheN XaNb8O7zmrChyJYXzQLbMo5KVsgtGc8pv3Qf2yJusn5OHZhu2QH5XdvDQNIcsW6hTxbz 6d1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.65 with SMTP id g1mr5376370bkg.50.1347422157665; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.156.143 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:55:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:55:57 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: I was tired of waiting. From: Pepe To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Alex Which one is not correct? And Which one is correct? 1. Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago. 2. There is no main developer for unfinished Flex 4.6 components. thanks Shigeru Nakagaki 2012/9/12 Alex Harui : > > > > On 9/11/12 6:34 PM, "pepe.fxug@gmail.com" wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I heard that Flex SDK team was already broke up a few months ago. >> And currently just two people(?) are working on development of >> unfinished Flex 4.6 components in their spare time. I mean they have >> main tasks besides Flex. >> >> Is this right, Adobe? >> > No, that's not correct. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >