Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates
 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CC73D6AE.1B2E1%cframpto@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CACK5iZd7mWLNro-tAncpComVn1npHqiVg-Hd420VekGuNiynMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CC73D6AE.1B2E1%cframpto@adobe.com>
From: Om <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 18:50:55 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CACK5iZf-VOM9mQ-vHATh40zmN5GZsVUpwAKzf9JqcMyyx8ZLdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release InstallApacheFlex 1.0 - RC2
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040838d3d82f6e04c9634f50

--f46d040838d3d82f6e04c9634f50
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 9/7/12 8 :00PM, "Om" <bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Here are the list of things fixed after the feedback received from the
> >first vote:
> >
> >4.  Removed IDE specific files - .project, etc. from the source
> >distribution
>
> Then this section of the README doesn't make sense.
>
> ===========================================================================
> ===============
> How to build the installer using Adobe Flash Builder (or any other IDE):
> ===========================================================================
> ===============
>
>
> Carol
>
> Why do you think so?  One can still use the source distribution with Flash
Builder/other IDEs.  We are just not shipping the .project,
.flexProperties, etc. files.  FlashBuilder will go ahead and create these
files for the user.
The README explains the other things needed to make it work with
FlashBuilder/other IDEs.

Thanks,
Om

--f46d040838d3d82f6e04c9634f50--