Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-12679-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47CF1DAA6
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:05:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 22990 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 20:05:06 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22928 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2012 20:05:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 22920 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2012 20:05:06 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:05:06 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0
	tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.220.175] (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com)
 (209.85.220.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 20:04:59 +0000
Received: by vcqp1 with SMTP id p1so1621229vcq.6
        for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=mnh5qbH/d/zJz6UbFiJpF9QczSd73Om5lYmWyIromfc=;
        b=YVfrOWiwRUiLEGl94SkInr0A2uUercrV+H+6QEn89hixOTE7fp73DlFYSehQvVGqcT
         3YzIUlOZ5zTZodAHBOpFQkFh3+wMlKDruUN2vpnKpHNncb/eVTZpQFrkBp3iojUnnuZ2
         uNN1h1q6owg4QghvqXOeek1nFrX2FaQfo8mHna29Fl+m8Iit9WLRRPEhdZweD5fmqU2X
         GVryx4C0i1fDDhaUUNskAdV8wMi2+5+lE/QLQgsDR7hon8kVGht/dubvozqp4nrFFkKC
         iQN5H8zs8liE8KHCfA87FOew+uZD8hjXvwbDP7XAg1TgyyPepGU/2mcK8AZQw9BK3toH
         th+A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.32.233 with SMTP id m9mr8545266vei.23.1347912277696; Mon,
 17 Sep 2012 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.58.239.164 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B3A98368B@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
References: 
 <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419B3A98368B@nambx05.corp.adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:04:37 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAAgciqowSPLqQ2ZvaVjF2YTb8JV4LJs3VXXiq2NYbyrO+QrCgw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Falcon and MXML 2006
From: Roland Zwaga <roland@stackandheap.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b339229801f5d04c9eb4867
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQkbsIQnif1JWAbc4Wth9tno0c5uJc3H6SEJkVku6GXC7cZKiva9v/fRyzffYRpU9r6FWQDZ

--047d7b339229801f5d04c9eb4867
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 17 September 2012 20:25, Gordon Smith <gosmith@adobe.com> wrote:

> Does anybody still care about the 2006 dialect of MXML or has everybody
> moved to 2009? Does Falcon need to support MXML 2006?


Doesn't Flex 3.6 work depend on MXML 2006? Since this will be donated as
well, and a lot of enterprise apps are, apparently, still using 3.6
this might still be a relevant avenue.

Roland

--047d7b339229801f5d04c9eb4867--