Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C288CDEB5 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37745 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 13:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37599 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2012 13:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 37591 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2012 13:43:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [89.31.137.46] (HELO smtp01.udag.de) (89.31.137.46) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:43:43 +0000 Received: from [172.27.1.178] (hmbg-5f76178b.pool.mediaWays.net [95.118.23.139]) by smtp01.udag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C0C680758 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:43:22 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Flash Builder 4.7 Beta with Apache Flex 4.8 support References: <5058FFBD.6010508@dot-com-it.com> From: Phillip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <8CD787D4-3E4C-4E0E-A221-5EB538E35AB2@easee.de> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:42:59 +0200 To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > designer. It actually IS clear. Look at the faq section on the page Scott provided in h= is first mail. To make it short: UI Designer was removed in 4.7. Btw: This is my first response to this Mailing List, though following since b= eginning of this year. Im going to write a 'introducing myself' mail asap! Cheers=20 Phillip L=C3=BCdeling mobile mail Am 19.09.2012 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Monteiro : > sorry, It's not clear whether this new announced release supports the ui > designer. >=20 > Thanks > On Sep 18, 2012 8:27 PM, "Scott Castle" wrote: >=20 >>>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >> We've made a number of changes to how Flash Builder deals with SDK >> identification and versioning to permit it to work with new Apache SDKs, >> both the current 4.8 drop as well as future versions (there's a lot of >> quirky behavior we've seen dropping new SDKs into 4.6). We've also done >> extensive testing, which isn't directly visible as a new feature but >> should ensure a much smoother user experience. >>=20 >> - Scott >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 9/18/12 4:11 PM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote: >>=20 >>> On 9/18/2012 4:26 PM, Scott Castle wrote: >>>> Hi Flex developers, >>>>=20 >>>> I wanted to let the list know that the latest version of Flash Builder >>>> is >>>> currently in public beta with support for Apache Flex 4.8. >>> What does this mean? I couldn't figure out how Flash Builder 4.7 >>> support for Apache Flex is any different than Flash Builder 4.6 support >>> for Apache Flex. >>> How is Flash Builder 4.7 supporting Apache Flex 4.8? >>>=20 >>> I understand we can set up the Apache Flex SDK; but saw nothing else. >>> There is no documentation [that I could find] about what that support >>> actually means, or how it translates into a Flash Builder feature that >>> was not there before. >>>=20 >>> [Thank you for 64-bit Flash Builder, though] >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20